A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Meruliopsis taxicola has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens51
Marker genes1
eDNA detections80
Countries11
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS
fungal barcode
07Deep time~9.4 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin9.4 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type8 486 records
Wild obs. + sensor7 180
Museum / vouchered1 305
Cultivated / captive1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO21 856 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy93% within 1 km
≤100 m 5 346≤1 km 1 059≤10 km 489>10 km 16
6 910 georeferenced · 270 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor7 180
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy68% within 1 km
≤100 m 303≤1 km 271≤10 km 235>10 km 37
846 georeferenced · 459 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 305
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions26 of 50 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
382
Olocation not on record
206
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
177
GJOlocation not on record
42
Philadelphia, US
37
Metsähallituslocation not on record
33
Uppsala, SE
29
Joensuu, FI
27
Jyväskylä, FI
26
Trondheim, NO
21
Tartu, EE
19
Göteborg, SE
17
Oulu, FI
17
Copenhagen, DK
14
Umeå Universitylocation not on record
14
Kuopio, FI
13
BioFokuslocation not on record
12
Stockholm, SE
12
Zürich, CH
12
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
11
LDlocation not on record
10
Görlitz, DE
10
Karlsruhe, DE
10
UNINE:NEUlocation not on record
9
Turku, FI
8
Vitoria, ES
7
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
6
nsnflocation not on record
6
CA
5
Mlocation not on record
5
Kew, GB
3
Helsinki, FI
3
MAlocation not on record
2
Bronx, US
2
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
2
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
2
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
2
Ann Arbor, US
1
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
1
TENN-Flocation not on record
1
Rovaniemi, FI
1
Warsaw, PL
1
Toronto, CA
1
WU-MYClocation not on record
1
Research Collection of Bill Sheehanlocation not on record
1
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
1
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
1
Winterthur, CH
1
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kewlocation not on record
1
TROMlocation not on record
1
50 institutions · 1 226 of 1 305 vouchered records shown · 78 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA80 detections
Where the DNA of Meruliopsis taxicola was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found80
Studies independent surveys2
Countries11
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 80 detections have coordinates
Open the map11 countries0
NA T4 Skogsmark Kalkgranskog. Pa dod trestam…Dead pine
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.3 °C 4.90–19.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter20.5 °C
Max temp (day)18.4 °C 7.80–24.8
Min temp (night)8.80 °C 0.7–14.5
Precipitation78.8 mm/mo 49.2–178
Air humidity58.9 % 56.5–67.1
Moisture balance14.6 mm/mo -60.9–136
Vapour deficit676 Pa 313–981
Wind speed2.70 m/s 2.10–3.60
Cloud cover41.6 % 34.5–50.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 34 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.