Malus toringo
(Siebold) de Vriese · speciesAt a glance
Sources11 archives
Databases and archives Malus toringo's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation10 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 832 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI25 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics35 specimens↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
NPASSNat. Product Activity & Species Sourcecompounds↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotypeEvery layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Malus sargentii, the Sargent crabapple or Sargent's apple, is a species of flowering plant in the genus Malus of the family Rosaceae. The species was formerly considered a variety of the species Malus sieboldii.Plants for a Future It is a shrub or small tree growing to 6-10 ft tall and 6-12 ft broad. Malus sargentii is native to Japan but is commonly used as an attractive compact ornamental shrub elsewhere. Every other year it bears masses of pink buds opening to fragrant white blossom. In the autumn, many small red globose fruits appear, persisting on the tree until winter.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology20
Life cycle & reproduction27
Diet & foraging1
Habitat & environment29
Physiology & chemistry20
Uses & economy16
Other traits7
Compounds documented for Malus toringo across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile5 classes
Documented compounds43 total
| Compound | Class | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| (+)-alpha-Pinene | present | NPASS | |
| (+)-Erythrodiol | present | NPASS | |
| (+)-Isoborneol | present | NPASS | |
| (-)-Caryophyllene | present | NPASS | |
| (1S,2R,4aS,6aR,6aS,6bR,8aR,9R,10R,11R,12aS,14bS)-10,11-dihydroxy-9-(hydroxymethyl)-1,2,6a,6b,9,12a-hexamethyl-13-oxo-1,2,3,4,5,6,6a,7,8,8a,10,11,12,14b-tetradecahydropicene-4a-carboxylic acid | present | NPASS | |
| (1S,2R,4aS,6aR,6aS,6bR,8aS,9R,10R,11R,12aR,14bS)-10,11-dihydroxy-9-(hydroxymethyl)-1,2,6a,6b,9,12a-hexamethyl-2,3,4,5,6,6a,7,8,8a,10,11,12,13,14b-tetradecahydro-1H-picene-4a-carboxylic acid | present | NPASS | |
| (1S,3R,4S,6S,7S,9S)-4,6-dibromo-3-ethyl-9-[(E)-pent-2-en-4-ynyl]-2,8-dioxabicyclo[5.2.1]decane | present | NPASS | |
| (2aR,3S,4aR,5R,6S,8R,8aS)-3,6-dibromo-2a,4a,5,8-tetramethyl-2,3,4,5,6,8-hexahydro-1H-cyclobuta[i]inden-7-one | present | NPASS | |
| (2R,3S,5Z,8Z,10S)-3-bromo-10-[(Z)-but-1-en-3-ynyl]-2-ethyl-3,4,7,10-tetrahydro-2H-oxecine | present | NPASS | |
| (2R,4Z,7Z,9S)-2-[(1S)-1-bromopropyl]-9-[(Z)-but-1-en-3-ynyl]-2,3,6,9-tetrahydrooxonine | present | NPASS |
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Malus toringo has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Malus toringo carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
2n 515×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · kew
2n 682×CCDB · kew
2n 852×CCDB · book-atlas-flowering-plants · CCDB · kew
2n 341×CCDB · kew
diploid inferred1×PloiDB · genus-scale
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
Record type2 832 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions42 of 79 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Nagano City, JP | 235 |
| Shinshu Universitylocation not on record | 177 |
| Odawara, JP | 67 |
| Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP | 56 |
| KR | 52 |
| Toyama, JP | 51 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 47 |
| Fukushima Universitylocation not on record | 42 |
| Tsukuba, JP | 41 |
| Bando, JP | 34 |
| Tomioka, JP | 32 |
| KIRMlocation not on record | 27 |
| Olocation not on record | 26 |
| Sendai, JP | 25 |
| Corvallis, US | 24 |
| Sugadaira Research Station, Mountain Science Center, University of Tsukubalocation not on record | 21 |
| Kyoto Universitylocation not on record | 20 |
| JP | 19 |
| Herbarium of the Department of Botany, University of Tokyolocation not on record | 16 |
| Akita Prefectural Museumlocation not on record | 14 |
| KOMlocation not on record | 12 |
| NSMKlocation not on record | 10 |
| Nishihara, JP | 10 |
| Toyota city nature sanctuarylocation not on record | 10 |
| LDlocation not on record | 9 |
| Otaru, JP | 9 |
| Bronx, US | 7 |
| Helsinki, FI | 6 |
| Elocation not on record | 6 |
| Cambridge, US | 6 |
| Forestry and Forest Products Research Institutelocation not on record | 6 |
| Sagamihara, JP | 6 |
| Omachi Alpine Museumlocation not on record | 6 |
| Chongqing Museumlocation not on record | 5 |
| Nishihara, JP | 5 |
| Oskarshamn, SE | 5 |
| Rotorua, NZ | 5 |
| WTUlocation not on record | 5 |
| Kushiro City Museumlocation not on record | 4 |
| Stockholm, SE | 4 |
| Korea National Arboretumlocation not on record | 4 |
| Iwate Prefectural Museumlocation not on record | 4 |
| Moscow State Universitylocation not on record | 4 |
| Wuzhou, CN | 4 |
| MeiseBGlocation not on record | 3 |
| Taipei, TW | 3 |
| Universidad Católica de Santa Maríalocation not on record | 3 |
| SIHUlocation not on record | 3 |
| Kew, GB | 2 |
| Wlocation not on record | 2 |
| DMZ botanic gardenlocation not on record | 2 |
| Portland, US | 2 |
| Riverside, US | 2 |
| University of New Hampshirelocation not on record | 2 |
| Kochi, JP | 2 |
| Cambridge, US | 2 |
| KMNlocation not on record | 2 |
| Chiba, JP | 2 |
| Dekalb, US | 2 |
| Guangzhou, CN | 2 |
| Chapel Hill, US | 1 |
| Saint Louis, US | 1 |
| Herbarium of South China Botanical Gardenlocation not on record | 1 |
| Taipei, TW | 1 |
| Madison, US | 1 |
| Sanda, JP | 1 |
| South Kensington, GB | 1 |
| McWane Science Centerlocation not on record | 1 |
| Fort Worth, US | 1 |
| Paris, FR | 1 |
| GBS RAN - Glavny Botanichesky Sad Rossijskoj Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 1 |
| Edinburgh, GB | 1 |
| Museum Of Natural And Environmental History, Shizuokalocation not on record | 1 |
| Kunming, CN | 1 |
| BClocation not on record | 1 |
| BDBClocation not on record | 1 |
| Pullman, US | 1 |
| DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record | 1 |
| Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record | 1 |
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Where the DNA of Malus toringo was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.