Malus angustifolia, le Pommetier austral, est une espèce de plantes à fleurs de la famille des Rosaceae. C'est un pommier sauvage originaire de l'est et du centre-sud des États-Unis.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Malus angustifolia has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens4
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections4
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL8★ITS1★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB · GoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualMalus angustifolia carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size1 148 172 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Malus angustifolia1.15 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type826 records
Wild obs. + sensor260
Museum / vouchered467
Other99
Origin
Native96
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 328 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy81% within 1 km
≤100 m 152≤1 km 24≤10 km 6>10 km 36
218 georeferenced · 42 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor260
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy45% within 1 km
≤100 m 32≤1 km 74≤10 km 102>10 km 29
237 georeferenced · 230 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence467
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions35 of 57 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
DOI/NPS, Mississippi National River & Recreation Arealocation not on record
42
Chapel Hill, US
35
Toronto, CA
31
Bangkok, TH
26
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
25
Jackson, US
23
Columbia, US
21
Bronx, US
19
Fort Worth, US
18
Tuscaloosa, US
18
Williamsburg, US
17
Philadelphia, US
16
Paris, FR
15
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
13
Saint Louis, US
13
GAlocation not on record
10
Tall Timbers Research Stationlocation not on record
8
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
8
Miami, US
7
Norfolk, US
7
Little Rock, US
6
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
6
Wuzhou, CN
5
Knoxville, US
5
University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record
5
Bloomington, US
5
US
4
Clemson, US
4
University of Tennessee at Chattanoogalocation not on record
4
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
4
Maryland Department of Natural Resourceslocation not on record
3
Western Carolina Universitylocation not on record
3
Tampa, US
3
Lincoln, US
2
BAYLUlocation not on record
2
University of North Carolina at Pembrokelocation not on record
2
San Angelo, US
2
GB
1
DOI/NPS, Selma to Montgomery National Historic Traillocation not on record
1
Millersville, US
1
Fairfax, US
1
ASUlocation not on record
1
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
1
EL PASO, US
1
Due West, US
1
Oswego, US
1
Edmonton, CA
1
LDlocation not on record
1
AUAlocation not on record
1
Philadelphia, US
1
Mérida, MX
1
Burlington, US
1
James F. Matthews Center for Biodiversity Studieslocation not on record
1
Riverside, US
1
Audubon Society -- Silver Bluff Audubon Center and Sanctuarylocation not on record
1
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
1
Russellville, US
1
57 institutions · 457 of 467 vouchered records shown · 10 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Malus angustifolia was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.