Macrolepiota procera, the parasol mushroom, is a basidiomycete fungus with a large, prominent fruiting body resembling a parasol. It is a fairly common species on well-drained soils. It is found solitary or in groups and fairy rings in pastures and occasionally in woodland. Globally, it is widespread in temperate regions.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Macrolepiota procera has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens14
Marker genes2
eDNA detections335
Countries11
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS★ITS1
fungal barcode
07Deep time~17.5 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin17.5 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type53 922 records
Wild obs. + sensor52 837
Museum / vouchered913
Cultivated / captive1
Other171
Origin
Native10
Introduced1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO82 944 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy45% within 1 km
≤100 m 12 021≤1 km 7 181≤10 km 23 116>10 km 824
43 142 georeferenced · 9 695 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor52 837
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy68% within 1 km
≤100 m 87≤1 km 147≤10 km 91>10 km 19
344 georeferenced · 569 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence913
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km
≤10 km 1
1 georeferenced
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions48 of 94 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Bronx, US
97
Kyiv, UA
66
Zapopan, MX
41
Joensuu, FI
40
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
39
BDBClocation not on record
32
Chicago, US
21
Olocation not on record
20
Osaka, JP
20
Helsinki, FI
19
Copenhagen, DK
18
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
18
Philadelphia, US
16
Kew, GB
15
Toronto, CA
15
San Sebastián, ES
14
Görlitz, DE
13
Karlsruhe, DE
12
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
12
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
12
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
12
TENN-Flocation not on record
11
Tomioka, JP
11
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
11
Chiba, JP
10
GJOlocation not on record
10
Oulu, FI
10
Bando, JP
9
Durham, US
9
Uppsala, SE
8
WU-MYClocation not on record
7
Córdoba, ES
7
MeiseBGlocation not on record
7
Odawara, JP
6
Göteborg, SE
6
LDlocation not on record
6
Mérida, ES
6
TUR-Alocation not on record
5
Salzburg, AT
5
Staten Island, US
5
ILLSlocation not on record
5
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
4
Zürich, CH
4
Mexico City, MX
4
Kuopio, FI
4
Vitoria, ES
4
Ann Arbor, US
3
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
3
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
3
FLASlocation not on record
3
Hobart, AU
3
MAlocation not on record
3
Department of Plant Resources, National Herbarium and Plant Laboratorieslocation not on record
3
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
3
St. Paul, US
2
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
2
Kathmandu, NP
2
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
2
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
2
Warsaw, PL
2
V. N. Karazin National Universitylocation not on record
2
WTUlocation not on record
2
Turku, FI
2
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
2
Cincinnati, US
2
BRNUlocation not on record
2
Ciudad de México, MX
1
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
1
Tilburg, NL
1
HabitatVisionlocation not on record
1
Pullman, US
1
Laramie, US
1
Baton Rouge, US
1
DPIlocation not on record
1
Yerevan State Universitylocation not on record
1
University of Warsawlocation not on record
1
Jyväskylä, FI
1
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
1
Tartu, EE
1
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
1
KNAMlocation not on record
1
Durango, MX
1
IPA/SPlocation not on record
1
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
1
Toyota city nature sanctuarylocation not on record
1
Trondheim, NO
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
Purdue Universitylocation not on record
1
Canberra, AU
1
Natural History Museum, Tribhuvan Universitylocation not on record
1
Fungario QCAM de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuadorlocation not on record
1
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
1
Grupo Actinomicetales Merida Facultad de Medicinalocation not on record
1
European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record
1
94 institutions · 802 of 913 vouchered records shown · 111 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA335 detections
Where the DNA of Macrolepiota procera was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found335
Studies independent surveys6
Countries11
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 335 detections have coordinates
Open the map11 countries0
Palearctic
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Measured at samplingin-field
Temperature26.9 °C
Conductivity55,664 µS/cm
Salinity35.4 PSU
Turbidity0.213 NTU
Depth0 m
Pelagic
1 sample with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median17.8 °C 11.8–21.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.6 °C
Max temp (day)19.0 °C 15.2–23.8
Min temp (night)13.2 °C 8.90–18.3
Precipitation85.2 mm/mo 52.0–101
Air humidity59.3 % 58.5–64.4
Moisture balance0.9 mm/mo
Vapour deficit847 Pa 493–1,064
Wind speed3.00 m/s
Cloud cover38.2 % 26.7–43.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 325 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.