A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Lyonia ferruginea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences6
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK3★rbcL3
plant barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 234 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 705
Museum / vouchered529
Origin
Native1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO4 048 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy87% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 004≤1 km 187≤10 km 70>10 km 111
1 372 georeferenced · 333 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 705
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy31% within 1 km
≤100 m 29≤1 km 20≤10 km 63>10 km 46
158 georeferenced · 371 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence529
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions35 of 52 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Tampa, US
116
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
83
Bangkok, TH
34
Miami, US
31
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
27
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
25
Madison, US
22
Philadelphia, US
16
Bronx, US
16
Saint Louis, US
16
Durango, MX
12
Mexico City, MX
10
BAYLUlocation not on record
8
Knoxville, US
8
Tall Timbers Research Stationlocation not on record
7
GAlocation not on record
7
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
6
Bloomington, US
5
Kew, GB
5
Austin, US
5
Claremont, US
5
Mississippi State, US
5
Appalachian State Universitylocation not on record
4
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
4
Long Beach, US
3
Jackson, US
3
Burlington, US
3
AUAlocation not on record
3
Dover, US
3
Dekalb, US
2
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
2
Wellington, NZ
2
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
2
Tapachula, MX
1
US
1
Tempe, US
1
Chapel Hill, US
1
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
1
Due West, US
1
Richmond, US
1
Flagstaff, US
1
Chadron, US
1
Fort Worth, US
1
NO DISPONIBLElocation not on record
1
Oskarshamn, SE
1
Florida Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
1
CASlocation not on record
1
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
1
New Brunswick, US
1
Columbia, US
1
Beijing, CN
1
San Angelo, US
1
52 institutions · 519 of 529 vouchered records shown · 10 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Lyonia ferruginea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.