Lycoperdon marginatum, commonly known as the peeling puffball, is a type of puffball mushroom in the genus Lycoperdon. A common species, it is found in Europe and North America, where it grows on the ground. It is characterized by the way that the spiny outer layer peels off in sheets.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Lycoperdon marginatum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes1
eDNA detections2
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS
fungal barcode
07Deep time~0.31 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin0.31 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 397 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 854
Museum / vouchered524
Other19
Origin
Native1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO8 024 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy78% within 1 km
≤100 m 912≤1 km 217≤10 km 183>10 km 134
1 446 georeferenced · 408 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 854
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy25% within 1 km
≤100 m 6≤1 km 56≤10 km 153>10 km 36
251 georeferenced · 273 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence524
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions26 of 48 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Bronx, US
95
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
81
Chicago, US
38
Ann Arbor, US
33
IMBIVlocation not on record
31
Chapel Hill, US
24
Toronto, CA
23
FLASlocation not on record
18
ILLSlocation not on record
18
TENN-Flocation not on record
18
Ensenada, MX
16
Champaign, US
13
BDBClocation not on record
11
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
9
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
7
Pullman, US
7
Denver, US
6
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
5
St. Paul, US
5
Vancouver, CA
4
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
4
Universidade Federale do Rio Grande do Sullocation not on record
3
Córdoba, ES
3
Blacksburg, US
3
Tampa, US
3
PHlocation not on record
3
Schenectady, US
3
Cincinnati, US
3
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
2
Blumenau, BR
2
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
2
Durango, MX
2
Karlsruhe, DE
1
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
1
Personal Herbarium of Paula DeSantolocation not on record
1
San Sebastián, ES
1
Gijón, ES
1
Grupo Actinomicetales Merida Facultad de Medicinalocation not on record
1
Kew, GB
1
IPA/SPlocation not on record
1
WU-MYClocation not on record
1
Ciudad de México, MX
1
Copenhagen, DK
1
US
1
DPIlocation not on record
1
Personal Herbarium of Robert Bensonlocation not on record
1
Madison, US
1
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
1
48 institutions · 511 of 524 vouchered records shown · 13 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Lycoperdon marginatum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
Open grassy verge of the road.
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median21.8 °C 17.8–25.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter20.9 °C
Max temp (day)26.2 °C 21.7–30.6
Min temp (night)18.6 °C 15.4–21.8
Precipitation106 mm/mo 103–109
Air humidity60.5 % 59.7–61.2
Moisture balance-16.3 mm/mo -42.7–10.0
Vapour deficit1,076 Pa 808–1,345
Wind speed3.40 m/s 3.30–3.50
Cloud cover36.2 % 26.0–46.3
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.