Limosella australis, common name Welsh mudwort, is an annual dicot plant that is indigenous to the United States and Canada. It has white flowers, and blooms between July to October. Its habitat is tidal mudflats, muddy or sandy shores It is listed as a special concern species in Connecticut.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
⚠ sources differ — AusTraits: water · GIFT: insect
Raunkiær life formtherophyte
Reproduction asexualpresent
Reproductive maturity1 years
Resprouting capacityresprouts
Sex typehermaphrodite+monoecious
Diet & foraging1
Parasiteindependent
Habitat & environment13
Aquaticterrestrial
Climatetemperate
Climberself-supporting
Elevation max4 500 m
Elevation min0 m
Epiphyteterrestrial
Fruit fleshinessdry
Fruit typecapsule
Growth formherb
Habitat GIFTCoastal
Leaf compoundnesssimple
Leaf shapeoblanceolate
Woodinessnon-woody
Physiology & chemistry2
Nitrogen fixingnon_nitrogen_fixer
Photosynthetic pathwayC3
Other traits1
Plant support typefree-standing
05DNA & barcoding13 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Limosella australis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens13
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections7
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL4★rbcLa★ITS5★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB · GoaT
The complete instruction manualLimosella australis carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size361 860 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Limosella australis0.36 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — GERVAIS, C. & J. Cayouette. 1985. Liste annotée de nombres chromosomiques de la flore vasculaire du nord-est de l'Amerique IV. Naturaliste Canad. 112: 319–331.
CCDB · book-atlas-flowering-plants — Vachell & B. 1939
2n 602×CCDB · new-zealand · CCDB · book-fedorov
CCDB · new-zealand
CCDB · book-fedorov — Hair, Beuzenberg 1960
2n 481×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Moore, D. M. 1981. Cromosome numbers of Fuegian angiosperms. Bol. Soc. Brot. 53: 995–1012.
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy82% within 1 km
≤100 m 758≤1 km 302≤10 km 186>10 km 40
1 286 georeferenced · 369 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 655
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy44% within 1 km
≤100 m 67≤1 km 156≤10 km 242>10 km 42
507 georeferenced · 269 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence776
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km
≤100 m 1
1 georeferenced
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions38 of 61 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
203
Canberra, AU
94
Hobart, AU
60
Mount Annan, AU
60
Adelaide, AU
54
Castelar, AR
27
Córdoba, AR
22
Paris, FR
17
Brisbane, AU
17
Armidale, AU
14
Saint John, CA
13
Kensington, AU
13
Bronx, US
12
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
10
Rotorua, NZ
10
Kew, GB
10
QVMAGlocation not on record
9
San Isidro, AR
8
Montréal, CA
8
Christchurch, NZ
7
Madison, US
6
Saint Louis, US
6
Wellington, NZ
5
Burlington, US
5
John T. Waterhouse Herbariumlocation not on record
4
Plocation not on record
4
UChlocation not on record
4
Fundación Miguel Lillolocation not on record
4
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
4
Québec, CA
4
Palmerston North, NZ
3
NSW Dept of Planning, Industry and Environmentlocation not on record
3
South Kensington, GB
3
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ)location not on record
3
Laboratory of Palaeontologylocation not on record
3
Stockholm, SE
3
Universidad de Buenos Aireslocation not on record
2
Bloomington, US
2
La Paz, BO
2
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
2
Batemans Bay, AU
2
Auckland, NZ
2
Parc Botanique et Zoologique de Tsimbazaza (PBZT)location not on record
2
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
2
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
1
AASlocation not on record
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Santiago, CL
1
Lake Charles, US
1
Chicago, US
1
Université Lavallocation not on record
1
Whitewater, US
1
B.A. Bennett Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Durham, US
1
National Museum Waleslocation not on record
1
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburghlocation not on record
1
RNPGlocation not on record
1
Parkville, AU
1
Berlin, DE
1
Dekalb, US
1
Pretoria, ZA
1
61 institutions · 765 of 776 vouchered records shown · 11 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA7 detections
Where the DNA of Limosella australis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found7
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 7 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
Sur les rochers humides du rivage.Rare Plants Nursery, Cultivated from wild so…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.4 °C 12.7–19.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter11.3 °C
Max temp (day)18.4 °C 16.0–23.6
Min temp (night)11.7 °C 8.60–14.9
Precipitation112 mm/mo 92.9–122
Air humidity66.0 % 61.3–66.4
Moisture balance-17.5 mm/mo -35.5–-4.60
Vapour deficit596 Pa 498–875
Wind speed5.50 m/s 3.90–5.50
Cloud cover48.8 % 48.8–48.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.