The weaver beetleBioLib Taxon profile — species Weaver Beetle Lamia textor (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lamia textor) is a species of beetle from subfamily Lamiinae in long-horned beetle family; it is a North Asia species.Жуки-усачи (COLEOPTERA, CERAMBYCIDAE) национального парка «Нечкинский» (с образом фауны этого семейства в Удмуртии) (rus.). — 2005. — № 10. — С. 90. Larvae develop in willow trees, rare in birch and poplar.Vol. 3 // Фауна СССР. Жесткокрылые. Жуки-дровосеки. Подсемейство Lamiinae ч. 1. — Москва-Ленинград: Издательство Академии наук СССР, 1958. — Т. XXII. — С. 498-500. — 575 с. — 2000 экз. Distributed everywhere in Western Europe, except extreme north, also distributed in Central and Eastern Europe, Siberia (meets on territories where appropriate these species food plants, starting from southern part of tundra), Caucasus, South Caucasus (rare), Sakhalin, in northern and western parts of Kazakhstan, Japan, Korea and in northeast of China.cerambyx.uochb.cz Lamia textor (Linnaeus, 1758) Imago is 15–32 mm long. Egg is 4.5–5 mm in length, and 1.2–1.4 mm in diameter.Vol. 1 // Усачи Северной Азии. Lamiinae. — Новосибирск: «Наука», 1984. — Т. III. — С. 92—98. — 214 с. — Front view of Weaver beetle's head with high magnification. References
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Lamia textor has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens7
BINs1
Marker genes2
eDNA detections8
Countries4
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus6 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 97% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 18 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)1.1%
Haplotypes5
BIN1
Most divergent pair1.4%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-3P★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type8 073 records
Wild obs. + sensor6 598
Museum / vouchered1 391
Fossil3
Other81
Origin
Native402
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO19 532 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy66% within 1 km
≤100 m 2 507≤1 km 1 091≤10 km 1 707>10 km 124
5 429 georeferenced · 1 169 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor6 598
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy22% within 1 km
≤100 m 56≤1 km 221≤10 km 970>10 km 40
1 287 georeferenced · 104 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 391
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions23 of 54 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
195
Brussels, BE
164
Paro, BT
90
Bern, CH
78
Geneva, CH
74
Tartu, EE
69
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
65
NHMOlocation not on record
40
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
35
Olocation not on record
33
Zürich, CH
30
Frauenfeld, CH
29
Helsinki, FI
26
Salzburg, AT
22
NEFlocation not on record
19
Stockholm, SE
17
Dhaka, BD
17
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
16
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
14
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
12
Fribourg, CH
11
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie der Landbouwhogeschoollocation not on record
11
Tallinn, EE
11
Winterthur, CH
9
Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record
9
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
9
RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record
9
Sion, CH
9
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
8
Naturmuseum Solothurnlocation not on record
8
Tilburg, NL
8
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
8
GVlocation not on record
7
Philadelphia, US
7
Naturmuseum Oltenlocation not on record
6
Trondheim, NO
6
Jyväskylä, FI
5
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
5
Oulu, FI
5
Musée de l'Hospice du Grand-Saint-Bernardlocation not on record
4
ZMAAlocation not on record
4
MUZOO - Musée d'histoire naturelle de La Chaux-de-Fondslocation not on record
4
TMPMlocation not on record
3
Tromsø, NO
3
Vitoria, ES
3
BioFokuslocation not on record
3
HUNMlocation not on record
3
SFRAlocation not on record
2
Naturama Aargaulocation not on record
2
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
2
NMOKlocation not on record
2
Kuopio, FI
1
NCMGlocation not on record
1
MZLUlocation not on record
1
54 institutions · 1 234 of 1 391 vouchered records shown · 157 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA8 detections
Where the DNA of Lamia textor was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found8
Studies independent surveys2
Countries4
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 8 detections have coordinates
Open the map4 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.9 °C 12.0–16.8
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.7 °C
Max temp (day)16.7 °C 15.7–20.7
Min temp (night)10.6 °C 7.00–12.4
Precipitation72.1 mm/mo 51.6–102
Air humidity58.2 % 56.5–60.8
Moisture balance-35.6 mm/mo -60.1–-21.5
Vapour deficit681 Pa 579–803
Wind speed2.70 m/s 2.20–4.10
Cloud cover42.9 % 36.0–53.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation9 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility8 073 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI8 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics7 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗