Habitat GIFTFloresta de Terra Firme, Floresta Ombrófila (= Floresta Pluvial)
Mycorrhiza typearbuscular
Woodinesswoody
Physiology & chemistry11
Ldmc max379 mg/g
Ldmc min379 mg/g
Leaf C:N ratio20.65 g/g
Leaf c527 mg/g
Leaf dry-matter content (LDMC)389 mg/g
Leaf n27.03 mg/g
Leaf p0.906 mg/g
Nitrogen fixingnon_nitrogen_fixer
Photosynthetic pathwayC3
Specific leaf area (SLA)24.63 mm²/mg
Wood density362 mg/cm³
03Chemical composition2 compounds
Compounds documented for Jacaranda copaia across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile1 class
Ursane and Taraxastane triterpenoids1
Documented compounds2 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
(+)-Ursolic Acid
present
LOTUS
Jacaranone
present
LOTUS
05DNA & barcoding7 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Jacaranda copaia has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens7
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences5
eDNA detections5
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Jacaranda copaia isolate BR17 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★rbcL2★rbcLa★ITS1
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualJacaranda copaia carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈616 158 746 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Jacaranda copaia0.62 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelScaffold
Completeness96.7% BUSCO
07Deep time~48.7 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin48.7 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type5 277 records
Wild obs. + sensor4 355
Museum / vouchered922
Origin
Native474
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO4 496 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy67% within 1 km
≤100 m 166≤1 km 29≤10 km 45>10 km 49
289 georeferenced · 4 066 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor4 355
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy19% within 1 km
≤100 m 1≤1 km 13≤10 km 49>10 km 12
75 georeferenced · 847 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence922
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions33 of 94 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Saint Louis, US
96
Bronx, US
88
Chicago, US
83
GeoPark Colombia S.A.S (GeoPark)location not on record
43
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
42
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
40
ASUlocation not on record
36
Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA)location not on record
31
Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas - SINCHIlocation not on record
30
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
26
Kew, GB
26
JBRJlocation not on record
20
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record
17
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
16
Santa Cruz de la Sierra, BO
15
USP-IBlocation not on record
13
Anton de Kom University of Surinamelocation not on record
13
UnBlocation not on record
13
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
12
Museum of Zoologylocation not on record
11
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
11
QCNElocation not on record
10
MAlocation not on record
9
Institut fur Allgemeine Mikrobiologielocation not on record
8
INBIOlocation not on record
8
Cuiabá, BR
7
Paris, FR
7
Herbario Selva Central Oxapampa - estación biológica del Jardín Botánico de Missourilocation not on record
7
La Paz, BO
7
UEPAlocation not on record
6
Universidade do Estado de Mato Grossolocation not on record
6
Xiamen, CN
5
Riobamba, EC
5
Universidad de la Amazonia (UniAmazonia)location not on record
5
Ann Arbor, US
5
Loja, EC
5
Aarhus, DK
5
Universiti Sains Malaysialocation not on record
4
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
4
Universidad Industrial de Santander (UIS)location not on record
4
UFAClocation not on record
4
South Kensington, GB
3
UNICAMPlocation not on record
3
IECOSlocation not on record
3
Tampa, US
3
San José, CR
2
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas (UDistrital)location not on record
2
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
2
Porto Velho, BR
2
IPA/SPlocation not on record
2
Universidade Federal do Maranhãolocation not on record
2
Area de Conservacion Guanacastelocation not on record
2
Cochabamba, BO
2
GB
2
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ)location not on record
2
Istituto Agrario Castelnuovolocation not on record
2
Durham, US
2
Cenargenlocation not on record
2
Cascavel, BR
2
Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Herbariolocation not on record
2
UTPLlocation not on record
2
ACT-Slocation not on record
2
UFRPElocation not on record
2
Quito, EC
2
Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
1
PUC-RSlocation not on record
1
UFPRlocation not on record
1
Universidad de los Andes (UniAndes)location not on record
1
Wlocation not on record
1
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
1
Guatemala, GT
1
Universität Göttingenlocation not on record
1
US
1
Universidade Paulistalocation not on record
1
Universidad Católica de Oriente (UCO)location not on record
1
Santiago de Cali, CO
1
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia (UPTC)location not on record
1
Fundación Desarrollo y Ambiente FUNDAlocation not on record
1
Altos de Pipe, VE
1
Collections de la Faculte des Sciences de Lyonlocation not on record
1
Zürich, CH
1
UNICAPlocation not on record
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Brasília, BR
1
Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad del Ecuadorlocation not on record
1
SCZlocation not on record
1
Universidad de Córdoba (UC)location not on record
1
Barcelona, ES
1
HUENFlocation not on record
1
Santarém, BR
1
Fundación Jardín Botánico Joaquín Antonio Uribe de Medellínlocation not on record
1
UNESP-FCAlocation not on record
1
UNESP-RClocation not on record
1
Fort Worth, US
1
94 institutions · 883 of 922 vouchered records shown · 37 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA5 detections
Where the DNA of Jacaranda copaia was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found5
Studies independent surveys1
Countries3
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 5 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median24.1 °C 22.8–25.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter2.30 °C
Max temp (day)27.1 °C 26.8–30.0
Min temp (night)21.9 °C 19.4–22.3
Precipitation201 mm/mo 56.7–361
Air humidity65.4 % 63.6–71.5
Moisture balance66.9 mm/mo -41.5–227
Vapour deficit1,006 Pa 840–1,144
Wind speed1.20 m/s 1.00–1.30
Cloud cover31.8 % 30.7–33.3
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.