Inonotus hispidus, commonly known as shaggy bracket, is a fungus and a plant pathogen. This fungus has been used in eastern Asia as a popular remedy for many illnesses like cancer, diabetes, and other stomach ailments. In modern pharmacology, the Inonotus hispidus has aided in lowering blood glucose levels, showing anti-tumor responses and improving overall health in mice.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Inonotus hispidus across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile4 classes
Kavalactones and derivatives8
Linear diarylheptanoids4
Shikimic acids and derivatives $ Simple phenolic acids2
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Inonotus hispidus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens18
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections18
Countries5
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P★ITS10★ITS1★ITS2
animal barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualInonotus hispidus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈34 017 109 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
THIS GENOME Inonotus hispidus0.03 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
07Deep time~0.01 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin0.01 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type7 636 records
Wild obs. + sensor6 980
Museum / vouchered644
Other12
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO17 316 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy50% within 1 km
≤100 m 2 175≤1 km 738≤10 km 2 783>10 km 151
5 847 georeferenced · 1 133 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor6 980
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy39% within 1 km
≤100 m 51≤1 km 59≤10 km 161>10 km 12
283 georeferenced · 361 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence644
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions31 of 58 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Uppsala, SE
43
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
42
Görlitz, DE
33
Bronx, US
32
Helsinki, FI
30
Olocation not on record
23
Karlsruhe, DE
20
Tartu, EE
20
Copenhagen, DK
18
GJOlocation not on record
16
Zürich, CH
14
Kew, GB
13
San Sebastián, ES
12
WU-MYClocation not on record
11
LDlocation not on record
9
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
9
BDBClocation not on record
8
Mlocation not on record
7
Chicago, US
6
MAlocation not on record
5
UNINE:NEUlocation not on record
5
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
4
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
4
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
4
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
4
Göteborg, SE
3
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
3
Brisbane, AU
3
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
3
Auckland, NZ
3
Department of Plant Resources, National Herbarium and Plant Laboratorieslocation not on record
3
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
3
Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistanlocation not on record
2
Staten Island, US
2
DPIlocation not on record
2
Salzburg, AT
2
Salamanca, ES
2
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
2
Gijón, ES
1
Baton Rouge, US
1
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
1
Mérida, ES
1
Toronto, CA
1
Mexico City, MX
1
FLASlocation not on record
1
Ciudad de México, MX
1
Denver, US
1
WTUlocation not on record
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
Trondheim, NO
1
Pullman, US
1
Blacksburg, US
1
Winterthur, CH
1
TFC Miclocation not on record
1
UAclocation not on record
1
TENN-Flocation not on record
1
Córdoba, ES
1
ILLSlocation not on record
1
58 institutions · 445 of 644 vouchered records shown · 198 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA18 detections
Where the DNA of Inonotus hispidus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found18
Studies independent surveys2
Countries2
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 18 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median9.20 °C 8.50–9.90
Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.6 °C
Max temp (day)15.1 °C 13.5–16.7
Min temp (night)3.20 °C 2.90–3.60
Precipitation40.6 mm/mo 39.0–42.2
Air humidity55.1 % 50.5–59.8
Moisture balance-7.80 mm/mo -19.9–4.20
Vapour deficit527 Pa 448–607
Wind speed2.10 m/s 2.00–2.20
Cloud cover40.2 % 35.4–44.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.