A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ibervillea lindheimeri has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens6
Marker genes5
eDNA detections4
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL★ITS★ITS2trnH-psbA
plant barcodefungal barcodemarker
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 919 records
Wild obs. + sensor2 603
Museum / vouchered315
Other1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 380 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy85% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 567≤1 km 247≤10 km 103>10 km 226
2 143 georeferenced · 460 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 603
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy46% within 1 km
≤100 m 49≤1 km 26≤10 km 76>10 km 13
164 georeferenced · 151 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence315
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions27 of 37 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Austin, US
77
Fort Worth, US
46
Bronx, US
32
BAYLUlocation not on record
30
Durango, MX
26
Texas Lutheran Universitylocation not on record
19
Saint Louis, US
12
Mexico City, MX
12
Lubbock, US
9
Wuzhou, CN
6
Juriquilla, MX
6
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
5
Austin, US
3
Bloomington, US
2
Tlalnepantla, MX
2
Mérida, MX
2
Mexico City, MX
2
Emporia, US
2
San Angelo, US
2
Kew, GB
2
MEXUlocation not on record
1
Clemson, US
1
Chicago, US
1
Tampa, US
1
Tulane Universitylocation not on record
1
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
1
Stephenville, US
1
Giardini Botanici Hanburylocation not on record
1
Pittsburg, US
1
Calabar, NG
1
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
1
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
EL PASO, US
1
Bangkok, TH
1
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
1
Burlington, US
1
37 institutions · 314 of 315 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Ibervillea lindheimeri was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median26.9 °C 26.9–26.9
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.6 °C
Max temp (day)32.0 °C
Min temp (night)22.4 °C
Precipitation119 mm/mo
Air humidity59.8 %
Moisture balance-70.8 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,430 Pa
Wind speed3.60 m/s
Cloud cover29.6 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 919 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI4 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics6 specimens↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗