Hypericum maculatum
Crantz · speciesAt a glance
Sources11 archives
Databases and archives Hypericum maculatum's data was compiled from.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility204 308 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI47 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics37 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotypeEvery layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Le Millepertuis taché ou Millepertuis maculé est une espèce de plantes à fleurs de la famille des Clusiacées selon la classification classique de Cronquist (1981) ou des Hypéricacées selon la classification phylogénétique APG III (2009). C'est une plante herbacée vivace trouvée en Europe et dans l'ouest de l'Asie, où elle pousse dans des prairies humides.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology10
Life cycle & reproduction13
Diet & foraging2
Habitat & environment8
Physiology & chemistry7
Other traits1
Compounds documented for Hypericum maculatum across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile5 classes
Documented compounds54 total
| Compound | Class | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-3-((2S,3R,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl)oxychromen-4-one | present | LOTUS | |
| 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-3-[(2S,3S,4R,5R,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxychromen-4-one | present | LOTUS | |
| 2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-3-[(2S,3S,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-methyloxan-2-yl]oxychromen-4-one | present | LOTUS | |
| 2-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-5,7-dihydroxy-4-oxo-4H-1-benzopyran-3-yl 6-deoxyhexopyranoside | present | LOTUS | |
| alpha-Catechin | present | LOTUS | |
| Amentoflavone | present | LOTUS | |
| Avicularin | present | LOTUS | |
| Behnic acid | present | LOTUS | |
| Carnaubic acid | present | LOTUS | |
| Catechin | present | LOTUS |
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Hypericum maculatum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Hypericum maculatum carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
2n 1634×GoaT · DTOL Flowering Plants Estimates Kew · CCDB · slov-fl · CCDB · iapt +10
2n 328×GoaT · DTOL Flowering Plants Estimates Kew · CCDB · brit-fl · CCDB · nw-europe-fl +3
n 83×CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 · CCDB · Cave1963 · CCDB · CromoCat 2015
n 01×CCDB · CromoCat 2015
diploid inferred1×PloiDB · genus-scale
Record type204 308 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions59 of 123 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record | 3 947 |
| Instytut Ochrony Przyrody Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 1 723 |
| Helsinki, FI | 593 |
| Olocation not on record | 456 |
| Salzburg, AT | 306 |
| LDlocation not on record | 303 |
| Moscow State Universitylocation not on record | 290 |
| Oulu, FI | 210 |
| Trondheim, NO | 172 |
| Bergen, NO | 153 |
| Oskarshamn, SE | 143 |
| Jyväskylä, FI | 119 |
| Turku, FI | 106 |
| TROMlocation not on record | 103 |
| MeiseBGlocation not on record | 99 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 98 |
| KMNlocation not on record | 84 |
| DBF-NHMDlocation not on record | 78 |
| BRNUlocation not on record | 58 |
| BFLlocation not on record | 56 |
| TUR-Alocation not on record | 51 |
| Uniwersytet Rolniczy im. Hugona Kołłątaja w Krakowielocation not on record | 49 |
| Tartu, EE | 47 |
| GZUlocation not on record | 47 |
| Görlitz, DE | 44 |
| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record | 41 |
| GBS RAN - Glavny Botanichesky Sad Rossijskoj Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 38 |
| BDBClocation not on record | 38 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 36 |
| GJOlocation not on record | 33 |
| Porvoo, FI | 31 |
| Mlocation not on record | 29 |
| Wlocation not on record | 26 |
| KFGBlocation not on record | 26 |
| Kuopio, FI | 25 |
| Dresden, DE | 25 |
| Tallinn, EE | 23 |
| Uniwersytet Warszawskilocation not on record | 21 |
| Uniwersytet Jagiellońskilocation not on record | 21 |
| Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical Universitylocation not on record | 20 |
| Zürich, CH | 18 |
| Berlin, DE | 17 |
| Uppsala, SE | 17 |
| Barcelona, ES | 16 |
| South Kensington, GB | 15 |
| Karlsruhe, DE | 13 |
| MAlocation not on record | 11 |
| Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record | 10 |
| Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universitat Greifswaldlocation not on record | 9 |
| València, ES | 9 |
| Conservatoire botanique national du Bassin parisienlocation not on record | 9 |
| Zürich, CH | 9 |
| Porrentruy, CH | 8 |
| Nijmegen, NL | 8 |
| National Museum Waleslocation not on record | 8 |
| Tula State Universitylocation not on record | 7 |
| Frankfurt am Main | 7 |
| Stockholm, SE | 6 |
| Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicachlocation not on record | 6 |
| Rovaniemi, FI | 6 |
| Philadelphia, US | 6 |
| PRClocation not on record | 6 |
| Fulda, DE | 5 |
| Kandalaksha State Nature Reservelocation not on record | 5 |
| Glarus, CH | 5 |
| Vancouver, CA | 5 |
| Bloomington, US | 5 |
| Forssa, FI | 5 |
| The Tula Region State Institution of Culture "Tula Museum Association"location not on record | 4 |
| BClocation not on record | 4 |
| San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record | 4 |
| Herb. BBGlocation not on record | 4 |
| College Park, US | 3 |
| nbflocation not on record | 3 |
| The State Museum-Preserve "The Kulikovo pole"location not on record | 3 |
| SWlocation not on record | 3 |
| Frauenfeld, CH | 3 |
| University of Guelph, OAC Herbariumlocation not on record | 3 |
| Kostrzyca Forest Gene Banklocation not on record | 3 |
| NoColllocation not on record | 3 |
| John May Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 2 |
| Philadelphia, US | 2 |
| Sion, CH | 2 |
| BSBIlocation not on record | 2 |
| Paris, FR | 2 |
| H-Schuhwlocation not on record | 2 |
| Salamanca, ES | 2 |
| Tromso University Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Toronto, CA | 1 |
| Monastir, TN | 1 |
| Kew, GB | 1 |
| University of British Columbia, Herbariumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record | 1 |
| Bangkok, TH | 1 |
| Staten Island, US | 1 |
| H-AkrKGlocation not on record | 1 |
| Chicago, US | 1 |
| IDElocation not on record | 1 |
| SZUlocation not on record | 1 |
| DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record | 1 |
| Logan, US | 1 |
| Royal Botanic Garden Edinburghlocation not on record | 1 |
| Saint Louis, US | 1 |
| Jaén, ES | 1 |
| Christchurch, NZ | 1 |
| Umeå Universitylocation not on record | 1 |
| BioFokuslocation not on record | 1 |
| CZE061location not on record | 1 |
| Whitewater, US | 1 |
| Whitehorse, CA | 1 |
| Podgorica, ME | 1 |
| Xiamen, CN | 1 |
| NMBU:MINAlocation not on record | 1 |
| Dekalb, US | 1 |
| Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reservelocation not on record | 1 |
| Alicante, ES | 1 |
| FLADlocation not on record | 1 |
| Garðabær, IS | 1 |
| Universidad del Pais Vasco (UPV/EHU)location not on record | 1 |
| Victoria, CA | 1 |
| ULBF-AGRlocation not on record | 1 |
| 1 | |
| Montréal, CA | 1 |
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Where the DNA of Hypericum maculatum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.