Hymenoxys hoopesii (formerly Dugaldia hoopesii) is a species of flowering plant in the daisy family known by the common names owl's claws, orange sneezeweed, and yerba del lobo. It is native to the western United States, where it grows in habitats of moderate elevation, such as mountain meadows in the Rocky Mountains, Sierra Nevada, southern Cascades, and other ranges. It has been found from Arizona, New Mexico, and central California north as far as Montana and Oregon.Biota of North America Program 2014 county distribution mapSEINet, Southwestern Biodiversity, Arizona chapterCalflora taxon report, University of California, Hymenoxys hoopesii (A. Gray) Bierner, 1994. Owl’s-claws, orange-sneezeweed H. hoopesii is an erect perennial herb growing up to about 1 meter (40 inches) in height, with smooth-edged leaves up to 30 cm long, oval on the lower stem and lance-shaped toward the top. Blooming from July to September, the inflorescence bears several flower heads on erect peduncles, each lined with a base of hairy, pointed phyllaries. The flower head is up to 7.5 cm wide and has a center of 100–325 tiny disc florets fringed with 14–26 orange or yellow ray florets, each ray up to 2.5 cm long. The fruit is an achene with a pappus of scales.Flora of North America, Hymenoxys hoopesii (A. Gray) Bierner, 1994. Owl’s-claws, orange-sneezeweed The species is toxic to livestock, especially sheep. The pollen also causes an allergenic reaction, hence the common name 'sneezeweed'. The root has been used medicinally to treat rheumatism, upset stomachs, and indigestion in infants.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Hymenoxys hoopesii across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Hymenoxys hoopesii has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens1
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences2
eDNA detections1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS2★ITS2
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualHymenoxys hoopesii carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — CHOUKSANOVA, N.A., L.I. SVESHNIKOVA, & T.V. ALEXANDROVA. 1968. Data on karyology of the family Compositae Giseke. Citologija 10: 198-206.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — ZHUKOVA, P. G. 1967. Karyology of some plants, cultivated in the Arctic-Alpine Botanical Garden. (In Russian). In N. A. Avrorin (ed.): Plantarum in Zonam Polarem Transportatio. II. Leningrad 1967, pp. 139-149.
CCDB · book-indian_vol1 — Zhukova, P.G. (Fedorov)
2n 151×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Powell, A. M., D. W. KYHOS & P. H. Raven. 1975. Chromosome numbers in Compositee. XI. Helenieae. Amer. J. Bot. 62: 1100–1103.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Powell, A. M., D. W. KYHOS & P. H. Raven. 1975. Chromosome numbers in Compositee. XI. Helenieae. Amer. J. Bot. 62: 1100–1103.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Chambers, K. L., D. Green, S. Potampa & L. McMahan. 1998. IOPB chromosome data 13. Newslett. Int. Organ. Pl. Biosyst. (Oslo) 29: 18–22.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Pinkava, D. J. & D. J. Keil. 1977. Chromosome counts of Compositae from the United States and Mexico. Amer. J. Bot. 64: 680–686.
CCDB · book-ipcn73-74 — MEHRA, P.N., & R. REMANANDAN. 1974. Cytolog>cal >nvestigat>ons on th[ Indian Compositae. II. Astereae, Hel~antheae, Helenleae, and Anthemideae. Caryologia 27: 255-289.
CCDB · Cave1962 — Beaman et al. 1962; Beaman & T. 1962
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy91% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 050≤1 km 193≤10 km 72>10 km 57
1 372 georeferenced · 406 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 778
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy45% within 1 km
≤100 m 54≤1 km 174≤10 km 268>10 km 16
512 georeferenced · 405 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence917
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km
≤10 km 2
2 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates
Open the mapnot free-living3
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions45 of 63 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Albuquerque, US
190
ASUlocation not on record
78
Flagstaff, US
70
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
57
Denver, US
48
Logan, US
38
Corvallis, US
28
Phoenix, US
24
Durango, US
24
Pocatello, US
20
Wuzhou, CN
18
Claremont, US
17
Saint Louis, US
16
Orem, US
14
San Luis Obispo, US
13
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
12
Provo, US
12
Boise, US
12
EL PASO, US
11
Santa Barbara, US
11
CASlocation not on record
10
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
9
San Diego, US
9
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
8
Chadron, US
7
Caldwell, US
7
Davis, US
6
Bronx, US
6
Pullman, US
6
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratorylocation not on record
6
WTUlocation not on record
5
Pittsburg, US
5
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
5
US
4
Northridge, US
4
Grand Junction, US
4
Arcata, US
4
INFlocation not on record
4
US
3
Riverside, US
3
Bangkok, TH
3
Vancouver, CA
3
GB
2
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
2
US
2
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
2
Bloomington, US
2
USFSlocation not on record
2
Ashland, US
2
Portland, US
2
Moscow, US
1
Feira de Santana, BR
1
Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record
1
Tacoma, US
1
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
1
Fargo, US
1
New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Sciencelocation not on record
1
San Jose, US
1
SEINetlocation not on record
1
Cslocation not on record
1
Taipei, TW
1
Karlsruhe, DE
1
San Angelo, US
1
63 institutions · 863 of 917 vouchered records shown · 54 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Hymenoxys hoopesii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.