Habitat GIFTSea coasts of the polar-arctic region, solonetzic waters of small water bodies, saline pools, bogs, lakelets, muddy shallows, ocean coast near river
estuaries, and maritime tundra.
Woodinessnon-woody
Other traits1
Shoot orientationerect
05DNA & barcoding44 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Hippuris tetraphylla has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens44
Marker genes6
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections20
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL6★rbcLa★ITS3★ITS1★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualHippuris tetraphylla carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy90% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 535≤1 km 191≤10 km 123>10 km 73
1 922 georeferenced · 47 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 969
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy31% within 1 km
≤100 m 44≤1 km 96≤10 km 97>10 km 211
448 georeferenced · 260 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence708
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 4 records without
Open the mapnot free-living4
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions27 of 59 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
173
Oulu, FI
55
Turku, FI
49
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
45
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
40
Université Lavallocation not on record
31
LDlocation not on record
22
Uppsala, SE
18
TROMlocation not on record
18
Olocation not on record
18
Québec, CA
16
Institute of the biological problems of the North FEB RASlocation not on record
15
13
Toronto, CA
9
TUR-Alocation not on record
9
Porvoo, FI
9
WINlocation not on record
9
Kandalaksha State Nature Reservelocation not on record
9
Vancouver, CA
7
Canadian Museum of Naturelocation not on record
7
Kuopio, FI
6
University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record
5
Anchorage, US
5
Whitehorse, CA
5
Montréal, CA
4
Trondheim, NO
4
Montréal, CA
4
Jyväskylä, FI
4
Churchill Northern Studies Centrelocation not on record
4
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
4
Finnish Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
3
Bergen, NO
3
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
3
Research Collection of B. A. Bennettlocation not on record
3
WTUlocation not on record
2
Oskarshamn, SE
2
MAlocation not on record
2
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
2
MeiseBGlocation not on record
2
Metsähallituslocation not on record
2
Pullman, US
2
IWEP FEB RASlocation not on record
2
Victoria, CA
2
Yukon Universitylocation not on record
2
Chapel Hill, US
1
NTNU University Museum, Department of Natural Historylocation not on record
1
University of British Columbia, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Davis, US
1
Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicachlocation not on record
1
Tempe, US
1
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
1
Provo, US
1
BioFokuslocation not on record
1
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
1
Dekalb, US
1
GBS RAN - Glavny Botanichesky Sad Rossijskoj Akademii Nauklocation not on record
1
Salamanca, ES
1
Madison, US
1
Uniwersytet Jagiellońskilocation not on record
1
59 institutions · 664 of 708 vouchered records shown · 44 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA20 detections
Where the DNA of Hippuris tetraphylla was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found20
Studies independent surveys1
Countries3
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 20 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
Shallow pond in estuarine marsh
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.9 °C 7.70–14.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter34.2 °C
Max temp (day)15.2 °C 12.3–18.8
Min temp (night)7.20 °C 5.00–11.5
Precipitation80.7 mm/mo 25.3–96.1
Air humidity61.5 % 60.0–63.8
Moisture balance-8.80 mm/mo
Vapour deficit503 Pa 405–671
Wind speed4.20 m/s
Cloud cover54.5 % 43.2–71.5
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 20 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.