Habronattus coecatus

Animalia/Arthropoda/Arachnida/Araneae/Salticidae/Habronattus

At a glance

Occurrence records1 000

Data sources8

Biological traits0

DNA specimens3

eDNA detections1

Sources8 archives

Databases and archives Habronattus coecatus's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation5 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 000 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗

World Spider CatalogNaturhist. Museum Bernworld catalog↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF1 000 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD3 specimens

01Narrative

Habronattus coecatus is a species of jumping spider that can be found in Mexico, the United States, and Bermuda.Distribution

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding3 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Habronattus coecatus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens3

Marker genes1

eDNA detections1

Countries1

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type1 000 records

Wild obs. + sensor944

Museum / vouchered56

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO2 880 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy63% within 1 km

≤100 m 418≤1 km 113≤10 km 61>10 km 247

839 georeferenced · 105 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor944

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km

≤10 km 5>10 km 1

6 georeferenced · 50 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence56

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions5 of 7 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Ohio State University Acarology Laboratorylocation not on record	44
US	3
Denver, US	2
Chicago, US	2
University of Indianapolislocation not on record	2
Chicago, US	2
Cambridge, US	1

7 institutions · 56 of 56 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Habronattus coecatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

At a glance

Sources8 archives

At a glance

Record type1 000 records

Range

Wildobservation + sensor

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Wildobservation + sensor

Holding institutions5 of 7 geolocated

Signal

Where its DNA was found

How strong is each trace?

Record type1 000 records