Gymnopilus voitkii

Malloch & Thorn · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Fungi/Basidiomycota/Agaricomycetes/Agaricales/Hymenogastraceae/Gymnopilus

At a glance

Occurrence records58

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens5

eDNA detections5

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Gymnopilus voitkii's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility58 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI5 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics5 specimens↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Occurrence & distributionGBIF58 records

Environmental DNA2 datasets · 1 countries5 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD5 specimens

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding5 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Gymnopilus voitkii has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens5

Marker genes3

eDNA detections5

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★ITS★ITS1★ITS2

fungal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type58 records

Wild obs. + sensor12

Museum / vouchered46

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO152 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy64% within 1 km

≤100 m 6≤1 km 1≤10 km 1>10 km 3

11 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor12

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤1 km 1

1 georeferenced · 45 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence46

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions3 of 5 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
CA	9
TENN-Flocation not on record	4
Philadelphia, US	2
Rene Pomerleau Herbariumlocation not on record	1
Saint John, CA	1

5 institutions · 17 of 46 vouchered records shown · 26 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA5 detections

Where the DNA of Gymnopilus voitkii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found5

Studies independent surveys2

Countries1

Verifiable raw sequence linked1

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 5 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

Foret de sapin (predominant) et epinette. Su…

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median12.8 °C 9.90–15.7

Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.0 °C

Max temp (day)15.0 °C 11.4–18.5

Min temp (night)11.2 °C 8.70–13.7

Precipitation102 mm/mo 93.2–111

Air humidity63.5 % 62.4–64.7

Moisture balance12.2 mm/mo

Vapour deficit555 Pa 445–638

Wind speed5.60 m/s

Cloud cover53.1 % 50.8–56.8

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)