Grampus griseus
(G.Cuvier, 1812) · speciesAt a glance
Sources13 archives
Databases and archives Grampus griseus's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation18 languages↗
Animal Diversity WebUniv. of Michigan MZspecies account↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility40 396 records↗
OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System29 798 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI26 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics35 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
Paleobiology DatabasePBDB consortiumfossil record↗
WikidataWikimedia Foundationstructured facts↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus) is a dolphin, the only species of the genus Grampus. Some of the closest related species to these dolphins include: pilot whales (Globicephala spp.), pygmy killer whales (Feresa attenuata), melon-headed whales (Peponocephala electra), and false killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens).
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology5
Life cycle & reproduction8
Diet & foraging4
Habitat & environment5
Uses & economy1
Other traits5
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Grampus griseus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
Besides the big genome in the nucleus, cells carry a small, circular loop of DNA inside the cell's energy factories — the mitochondria. It is inherited almost only from the mother and is a leftover from ancient bacteria that moved into the cell. The mitochondrial markers above (ND*, COX, CYTB…) are read from exactly this loop. Outer ring = one strand, inner ring = the other.
The complete instruction manual Grampus griseus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The solid bar is the fossil range: the span between the oldest and the youngest fossil that palaeontologists have assigned to Grampus griseus. Above itBeside it, the bars count how many dated finds fall in each slice of time; the tallest bar is labelled, and heights use a square-root scale so that thin slices stay visible next to rich ones. Read this as how well each stretch of time is preserved and studied — thick bars mean plenty of the right kind of rock and plenty of collectors, which is related to, but not the same as, how common it actually was. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
The two clocks disagree here. The fossil record reaches back to 23 Ma, but the molecular clock dates the lineage to only 4.97 Ma — about 18.1 Myr younger. A fossil cannot be older than the lineage it belongs to, so one of the two is off: either the fossil is assigned to the wrong species, or the clock is running fast.
How it livedPBDB
Record type70 211 records
Origin
Range
Depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions20 of 41 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Washington, US | 164 |
| Sydney, AU | 78 |
| Los Angeles, US | 46 |
| Centro de Investigacion Cientifica y de Educacion Superior de Ensenadalocation not on record | 37 |
| Museums Victorialocation not on record | 34 |
| Cambridge, US | 16 |
| CASlocation not on record | 13 |
| Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record | 9 |
| Natick, US | 5 |
| Seattle, US | 4 |
| DOI/NPS, Salem Maritime National Historic Sitelocation not on record | 4 |
| Berkeley, US | 3 |
| Western Australian Museumlocation not on record | 3 |
| National Museums Scotlandlocation not on record | 3 |
| North Carolina Museum of Natural Scienceslocation not on record | 3 |
| Louisiana State University, Museum of Zoologylocation not on record | 2 |
| Texas Cooperative Wildlife Collectionlocation not on record | 2 |
| Stockholm, SE | 2 |
| South Kensington, GB | 2 |
| Edmonton, CA | 2 |
| National Museum of Natural Sciencelocation not on record | 2 |
| Oceanopolis - BioGeMMElocation not on record | 2 |
| Puerto Ayora, EC | 2 |
| Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallerylocation not on record | 2 |
| IMEDEAlocation not on record | 1 |
| Chicago, US | 1 |
| NSW Dept of Planning, Industry and Environmentlocation not on record | 1 |
| Zacatecas, MX | 1 |
| Banyoles, ES | 1 |
| Albany, US | 1 |
| Tacoma, US | 1 |
| Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras José Benito Vives de Andréis (INVEMAR)location not on record | 1 |
| SMNHTAUlocation not on record | 1 |
| Southwest Fisheries Science Centerlocation not on record | 1 |
| San Diego, US | 1 |
| Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record | 1 |
| Buenos Aires, AR | 1 |
| Hardin-Simmons Universitylocation not on record | 1 |
| Saint John, CA | 1 |
| Brussels, BE | 1 |
| RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record | 1 |
Where the DNA of Grampus griseus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.