Gilia inconspicua is a species of flowering plant in the phlox family known by the common name shy gilia. It is native to the western United States, where it grows in sandy, open areas such as sagebrush and plateau. This is a small herb with a spreading, branched stem reaching a maximum height of about 30 centimeters. The leaves are mainly basal and are divided into small smooth-edged or toothed leaflets. The leaves and lower stem may be strung with cobweb-like fibers. The upper part of the stem around the inflorescence has a coat of black, hairlike gland fibers. Small flowers appear at the ends of the stem branches. Each is lavender with a yellowish throat.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Gilia inconspicua has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences2
eDNA detections2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★ITS1
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualGilia inconspicua carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 36 n = 18
Ploidydiploid inferred
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 361×CCDB · Cave1959
CCDB · Cave1959 — v. Grant 1959
n 91×CCDB · Cave1956
CCDB · Cave1956 — Grant,Beeks,& Lat.
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin2.24 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type793 records
Wild obs. + sensor42
Museum / vouchered751
Origin
Native1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 464 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy89% within 1 km
≤100 m 21≤1 km 4≤10 km 2>10 km 1
28 georeferenced · 14 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor42
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy47% within 1 km
≤100 m 33≤1 km 105≤10 km 146>10 km 11
295 georeferenced · 456 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence751
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions38 of 56 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Provo, US
120
Bronx, US
93
WTUlocation not on record
59
Claremont, US
51
Caldwell, US
35
Corvallis, US
34
Logan, US
29
Riverside, US
29
Flagstaff, US
28
Moscow, US
21
Wuzhou, CN
19
ASUlocation not on record
19
Henderson, US
16
Phoenix, US
16
Boise, US
15
Orem, US
13
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
11
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
10
Eastern Nevada Landscape Coalitionlocation not on record
9
Albuquerque, US
9
Pittsburg, US
8
CASlocation not on record
8
Denver, US
8
Bloomington, US
7
Pocatello, US
6
VALElocation not on record
5
Davis, US
5
San Jose, US
4
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
4
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
3
Angwin, US
3
Tempe, US
3
Los Angeles, US
3
Arcata, US
3
US
3
Bangkok, TH
3
Pullman, US
2
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
2
Bozeman, US
2
Bureau of Land Managementlocation not on record
2
San Diego, US
2
Vancouver, CA
1
INFlocation not on record
1
Ashland, US
1
Santa Barbara, US
1
Grand Junction, US
1
Beijing, CN
1
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
1
LDlocation not on record
1
Universität Göttingenlocation not on record
1
Bandelier National Monumentlocation not on record
1
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
1
Missoula, US
1
GZUlocation not on record
1
Northridge, US
1
Mexico City, MX
1
56 institutions · 737 of 751 vouchered records shown · 14 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Gilia inconspicua was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.