Compounds documented for Galphimia glauca across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Galphimia glauca has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens20
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections20
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK5★rbcL5★ITS
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualGalphimia glauca carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Kuriachan, P. I. & M. G. Vijayakumar. 1996. Cytomorphological studies in induced autotetraploid of Thryallis glauca. J. Cytol. Genet. 31(2): 173–177.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy83% within 1 km
≤100 m 157≤1 km 53≤10 km 33>10 km 10
253 georeferenced · 69 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor322
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy94% within 1 km
≤100 m 403≤1 km 33≤10 km 26>10 km 4
466 georeferenced · 248 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence714
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 2 records without
Open the mapnot free-living2
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions43 of 64 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Durango, MX
172
Ciudad de México, MX
86
Mexico City, MX
66
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Moreloslocation not on record
51
Baroda, IN
26
Chapingo, MX
24
Saint Louis, US
23
Juriquilla, MX
22
Anchorage, US
19
Riverside, US
17
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
13
Zacatecas, MX
12
Austin, US
10
Puebla, MX
9
Tapachula, MX
9
Autlán de Navarro, MX
9
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
9
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
6
Tlalnepantla, MX
6
Centro Cultural Santo Domingolocation not on record
6
San Diego, US
5
Universidad Industrial de Santander (UIS)location not on record
5
Bronx, US
4
The University of Arizonalocation not on record
4
MEXUlocation not on record
4
Mexico City, MX
4
Toluca, MX
4
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
4
Guatemala City, GT
4
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
3
Durban, ZA
3
TAFORI-LSRClocation not on record
3
CASlocation not on record
3
Kew, GB
3
La Paz, MX
3
Chaguaramas, TT
3
ASUlocation not on record
3
Berlin, DE
2
Ann Arbor, US
2
Mexico City, MX
2
San Luis Potosí, MX
2
Sociedad para el Estudio de los Recursos Bióticos de Oaxaca, A. C.location not on record
2
Instituto de Ecología Aplicada, Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipaslocation not on record
2
EL PASO, US
2
Antiguo Cuscatlán, SV
2
Guasave, MX
2
HEMlocation not on record
2
Mexico City, MX
2
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
1
Mérida, MX
1
Culiacán, MX
1
Hermosillo, MX
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Universidad de Caldas (UCaldas)location not on record
1
Monastir, TN
1
INBIOlocation not on record
1
Chicago, US
1
Lake Charles, US
1
Pondicherry, IN
1
San Francisco, US
1
Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajaralocation not on record
1
Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Méxicolocation not on record
1
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
1
Morelia, MX
1
64 institutions · 695 of 714 vouchered records shown · 5 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA20 detections
Where the DNA of Galphimia glauca was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found20
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 20 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median17.6 °C 17.6–17.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter9.60 °C
Max temp (day)22.4 °C
Min temp (night)11.9 °C
Precipitation74.8 mm/mo
Air humidity59.5 %
Moisture balance-50.3 mm/mo
Vapour deficit812 Pa
Wind speed3.50 m/s
Cloud cover20.7 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 15 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 038 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI20 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics20 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
NPASSNat. Product Activity & Species Sourcecompounds↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotype