Galeopsis segetum, la Galéopside douteuse ou Galéopside des champs, est une espèce de plantes à fleurs du genre Galeopsis et de la famille des Lamiacées. C'est une plante herbacée présente en Europe. Elle ressemble à la grande ortie, mais appartient à un genre différent et n'est pas urticante.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Galeopsis segetum across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Galeopsis segetum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens5
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences3
eDNA detections3
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL2
plant barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualGaleopsis segetum carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Albers, F. & W. Pröbsting. 1998. In R. Wisskirchen & H. Haeupler, Standardliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Bundesamt für Naturschutz & Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.
CCDB · book-fedorov — Miintzing 1928a, 1930a
CCDB · book-fedorov — Tischler 1934
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Albers, F. & Pröbsting, W. (1998). In R. Wisskirchen & H. Haeupler, Standardliste der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Bundesamt für Naturschutz & Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart
n 82×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · CromoCat 2015
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Wieffering, J. H. 1983. Chromosome numbers, scutellarin and iridoid patterns in the genus Galeopsis L. (Labiatae). Bot. Helv. 93: 239–253.
CCDB · CromoCat 2015 — Wieffering, J. H. (1983). Chromosome numbers, scutellarin and irioid patterns in the genus Galeopsis L. (Labiatae). Bot. helv. 93: 239-253.
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy42% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 951≤1 km 2 343≤10 km 5 975>10 km 68
10 337 georeferenced · 2 067 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor12 404
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy48% within 1 km
≤100 m 9≤1 km 234≤10 km 252>10 km 9
504 georeferenced · 538 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 042
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions30 of 65 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
MeiseBGlocation not on record
179
South Kensington, GB
53
Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universitat Greifswaldlocation not on record
52
Bern, CH
49
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
23
BFLlocation not on record
21
BDBClocation not on record
18
Zürich, CH
15
Nijmegen, NL
11
Staatliches Museum fuer Naturkunde Karlsruhe (State Museum of Natural History)location not on record
11
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
11
LDlocation not on record
10
BClocation not on record
8
Berlin, DE
8
Barcelona, ES
8
Porrentruy, CH
7
Conservatoire botanique national du Bassin parisienlocation not on record
7
Tilburg, NL
6
MAlocation not on record
6
BRNUlocation not on record
5
Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsinlocation not on record
4
Zürich, CH
4
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
4
Oskarshamn, SE
3
Mlocation not on record
3
Salamanca, ES
3
UGentlocation not on record
3
BSBIlocation not on record
3
Frankfurt am Main
2
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
2
University of Newcastle upon Tynelocation not on record
2
Karlsruhe, DE
2
València, ES
2
Elocation not on record
2
National Museum Waleslocation not on record
2
CJBNlocation not on record
2
Leeds Museums and Gallerieslocation not on record
1
Fribourg, CH
1
University of Bayreuthlocation not on record
1
Nottingham Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
BMlocation not on record
1
NMWlocation not on record
1
Saint Louis, US
1
Xiamen, CN
1
Olocation not on record
1
Columbia, US
1
Bourges, FR
1
Paris, FR
1
Kew, GB
1
Jaén, ES
1
CICYTEXlocation not on record
1
Cambridge University Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Naturalis Biodiversity Centerlocation not on record
1
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
1
Granada, ES
1
Görlitz, DE
1
BM|CGE|CMMlocation not on record
1
Dresden, DE
1
Namur, BE
1
John May Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
1
LUXEMBOURG, LU
1
Boumlocation not on record
1
Fulda, DE
1
Córdoba, ES
1
Alicante, ES
1
65 institutions · 580 of 1 042 vouchered records shown · 462 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Galeopsis segetum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.1 °C 13.1–17.3
Seasonal swing summer↔winter10.6 °C
Max temp (day)15.7 °C 15.7–20.9
Min temp (night)9.80 °C 9.80–13.3
Precipitation142 mm/mo 88.2–142
Air humidity70.8 % 62.1–70.8
Moisture balance51.4 mm/mo -34.0–51.4
Vapour deficit443 Pa 443–771
Wind speed7.30 m/s 4.60–7.30
Cloud cover48.3 % 37.6–48.3
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility13 479 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI3 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics5 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotype
WikidataWikimedia Foundationstructured facts↗