Fragaria moschata
Duchesne · speciesAt a glance
Sources15 archives
Databases and archives Fragaria moschata's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation9 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility15 686 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI6 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics12 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
NPASSNat. Product Activity & Species Sourcecompounds↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotype
Tree of SexTree of Sex Consortiumgenome & karyotype↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
The musk strawberry or hautbois strawberry (Fragaria moschata), is a species of strawberry native to Europe. Its French name hautbois strawberry may be anglicised as hautboy strawberry. The plants are hardy and can survive in many weather conditions. They are cultivated commercially on a small scale, particularly in Italy. The fruit are small and round; they are used in the gourmet community for their intense aroma and flavour, which has been compared to a mixture of regular strawberry, raspberry and pineapple. Popular cultivated varieties include 'Capron' and 'Profumata di Tortona'.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology6
Life cycle & reproduction12
Diet & foraging2
Habitat & environment7
Physiology & chemistry6
Other traits2
Compounds documented for Fragaria moschata across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile3 classes
Documented compounds4 total
| Compound | Class | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| (-)-Caryophyllene | present | NPASS | |
| (R)-alpha-Terpineol | present | LOTUS | |
| 2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl- | present | LOTUS | |
| trans-cinnamate | present | LOTUS |
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Fragaria moschata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Fragaria moschata carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
2n 4222×GoaT · Kew Plant DNA C-values Database · CCDB · slov-fl · CCDB · nw-europe-fl +10
2n 282×GoaT · Tree of Sex Database · CCDB · book-ipcn75-78
n 211×CCDB · book-ipcn67-71
polyploid inferred1×PloiDB · genus-scale
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Record type15 686 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions26 of 56 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| LDlocation not on record | 255 |
| Moscow State Universitylocation not on record | 217 |
| Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record | 193 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 119 |
| Oskarshamn, SE | 104 |
| Tartu, EE | 102 |
| Salzburg, AT | 98 |
| GBS RAN - Glavny Botanichesky Sad Rossijskoj Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 68 |
| DBF-NHMDlocation not on record | 53 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 44 |
| Tallinn, EE | 33 |
| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record | 30 |
| Bern, CH | 29 |
| Uniwersytet Opolskilocation not on record | 19 |
| Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record | 19 |
| Uppsala, SE | 13 |
| Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical Universitylocation not on record | 12 |
| CJBGlocation not on record | 11 |
| Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record | 11 |
| The State Museum-Preserve "The Kulikovo pole"location not on record | 8 |
| Tula State Universitylocation not on record | 7 |
| Voronezh State Universitylocation not on record | 7 |
| Frauenfeld, CH | 6 |
| Zürich, CH | 6 |
| Bourges, FR | 6 |
| Uniwersytet Rolniczy im. Hugona Kołłątaja w Krakowielocation not on record | 6 |
| SZUlocation not on record | 6 |
| The Tula Region State Institution of Culture "Tula Museum Association"location not on record | 5 |
| Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record | 4 |
| Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicachlocation not on record | 3 |
| Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museumlocation not on record | 3 |
| UGentlocation not on record | 3 |
| Prioksko-Terrasnyi Biosphere Reservelocation not on record | 2 |
| University of New Hampshirelocation not on record | 2 |
| Lausanne, CH | 2 |
| Philadelphia, US | 2 |
| Uniwersytet Warszawskilocation not on record | 2 |
| Guiyang, CN | 2 |
| Lanzhou, CN | 2 |
| Paris, FR | 2 |
| Porrentruy, CH | 2 |
| Zürich, CH | 2 |
| Beijing, CN | 2 |
| Uniwersytet Jagiellońskilocation not on record | 2 |
| Tromso University Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Namur, BE | 1 |
| Saint Louis, US | 1 |
| Wuzhou, CN | 1 |
| Dekalb, US | 1 |
| Boumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Görlitz, DE | 1 |
| Logan, US | 1 |
| Sevilla, ES | 1 |
| Jyväskylä, FI | 1 |
| Naturalis Biodiversity Centerlocation not on record | 1 |
| Wuhan, CN | 1 |
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Where the DNA of Fragaria moschata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.