Fragaria chiloensis
(L.) Mill. · speciesAt a glance
Sources9 archives
Databases and archives Fragaria chiloensis's data was compiled from.
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility7 837 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI11 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics17 specimens↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
giftgenome & karyotype
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotype
Tree of SexTree of Sex Consortiumgenome & karyotype↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Size & morphology6
Life cycle & reproduction27
Diet & foraging1
Habitat & environment27
Physiology & chemistry19
Uses & economy12
Other traits7
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Fragaria chiloensis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Fragaria chiloensis carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
2n 5623×GoaT · Tree of Sex Database · CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-ipcn66 +6
2n 141×CCDB · Cave1963
n 281×CCDB · book-ipcn67-71
polyploid inferred1×PloiDB · genus-scale
polyploid1×GIFT · GIFT (floras)
Record type7 837 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions57 of 84 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| DBF-NHMDlocation not on record | 87 |
| Vancouver, CA | 61 |
| Arcata, US | 24 |
| Claremont, US | 15 |
| San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record | 14 |
| Santa Barbara, US | 13 |
| Olocation not on record | 13 |
| San Luis Obispo, US | 11 |
| Corvallis, US | 11 |
| San Diego, US | 10 |
| San Francisco, US | 7 |
| Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record | 7 |
| University of Stellenboschlocation not on record | 7 |
| Davis, US | 6 |
| CASlocation not on record | 6 |
| LDlocation not on record | 5 |
| St. Paul, US | 5 |
| Santa Cruz, US | 5 |
| Chongqing Museumlocation not on record | 5 |
| Pullman, US | 5 |
| Tacoma, US | 5 |
| Moscow, US | 4 |
| Cheney, US | 4 |
| US | 4 |
| Riverside, US | 4 |
| Bend, US | 3 |
| Antiguo Cuscatlán, SV | 3 |
| Anchorage, US | 3 |
| Baroda, IN | 3 |
| Museo naturalistico del Frignano Ferruccio Minghellilocation not on record | 2 |
| KMNlocation not on record | 2 |
| Davenport, US | 2 |
| Hobart, AU | 2 |
| University of Guelph, OAC Herbariumlocation not on record | 2 |
| Blumenau, BR | 2 |
| DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record | 2 |
| Bloomington, US | 2 |
| Provo, US | 2 |
| Trondheim, NO | 2 |
| Irvine, US | 2 |
| US | 2 |
| Quito, EC | 2 |
| Oskarshamn, SE | 1 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 1 |
| Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record | 1 |
| Turlock, US | 1 |
| Parkville, AU | 1 |
| Canberra, AU | 1 |
| Los Angeles, US | 1 |
| La Paz, BO | 1 |
| Boise, US | 1 |
| Caldwell, US | 1 |
| Cochabamba, BO | 1 |
| CICYTEXlocation not on record | 1 |
| UTPLlocation not on record | 1 |
| Sucre, BO | 1 |
| Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (PUJ)location not on record | 1 |
| Corporación Universitaria Santa Rosa de Cabal (UNISARC)location not on record | 1 |
| Universidad de La Salle (La Salle)location not on record | 1 |
| Knoxville, US | 1 |
| Görlitz, DE | 1 |
| Kew, GB | 1 |
| DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record | 1 |
| Wlocation not on record | 1 |
| Guiyang, CN | 1 |
| Chadron, US | 1 |
| Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record | 1 |
| ASUlocation not on record | 1 |
| Dekalb, US | 1 |
| MAlocation not on record | 1 |
| Chicago, US | 1 |
| University of British Columbia, Herbariumlocation not on record | 1 |
| San Jose, US | 1 |
| University of Victorialocation not on record | 1 |
| Staten Island, US | 1 |
| Tampa, US | 1 |
| Toronto, CA | 1 |
| Bangkok, TH | 1 |
| Fredericton Stock Culture Collectionlocation not on record | 1 |
| Uppsala, SE | 1 |
| Pittsburg, US | 1 |
| Guilin, CN | 1 |
| Corrientes, AR | 1 |
| College Park, US | 1 |
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Where the DNA of Fragaria chiloensis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.