Filoboletus manipularis

(Berk.) Singer · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Fungi/Basidiomycota/Agaricomycetes/Agaricales/Mycenaceae/Filoboletus

At a glance

Occurrence records177

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens1

eDNA detections5

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Filoboletus manipularis's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation5 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility177 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI5 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics1 specimens↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF177 records

Environmental DNA3 datasets · 2 countries5 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD1 specimens

01Narrative

Mycena manipularis is a species of agaric fungus in the family Mycenaceae. Found in Australasia, Malaysia, and the Pacific islands, the mycelium and fruit bodies of the fungus are bioluminescent.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding1 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Filoboletus manipularis has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections5

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★ITS

fungal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type177 records

Wild obs. + sensor97

Museum / vouchered80

Origin

Native1

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO468 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy80% within 1 km

≤100 m 3≤1 km 32≤10 km 7>10 km 2

44 georeferenced · 53 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor97

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy51% within 1 km

≤100 m 25≤1 km 2≤10 km 24>10 km 2

53 georeferenced · 27 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence80

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions9 of 15 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Brisbane, AU	43
IPA/SPlocation not on record	7
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record	6
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record	6
National Museum of Natural Sciencelocation not on record	5
Bronx, US	3
Durham, US	1
TENN-Flocation not on record	1
Kew, GB	1
Philadelphia, US	1
Kensington, AU	1
Auckland, NZ	1
FLASlocation not on record	1
Palmerston, AU	1
Canberra, AU	1

15 institutions · 79 of 80 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA5 detections

Where the DNA of Filoboletus manipularis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found5

Studies independent surveys3

Countries2

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 5 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Measured at samplingin-field

pH6.85 6.80–6.90

Conductivity168 µS/cm 143–192

Organic carbon3.37 % 2.92–3.82

Water content31.4 % 28.6–34.1

Nitrate-N17.5 mg/kg 15.0–20.0

Phosphorus142 mg/kg 108–176

Clay19.8 % 12.5–27.0

Sand68.9 % 57.4–80.5

Depth0 m

SoilLatLon out of range

2 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median27.2 °C 26.0–27.2

Seasonal swing summer↔winter2.00 °C

Max temp (day)27.9 °C 27.9–28.9

Min temp (night)26.2 °C 23.2–26.2

Precipitation356 mm/mo 241–356

Air humidity65.1 % 64.1–65.1

Vapour deficit1,252 Pa 1,206–1,252

Cloud cover64.5 % 64.2–64.5

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)