Ficus retusa est une espèce de plantes dicotylédones de la famille des Moraceae, originaire d'Indonésie. L'espèce est souvent considérée comme répandue en tant que plante d'ornement, et notamment comme bonsaï, mais il s'agit d'une confusion avec l'espèce Ficus microcarpa.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
⚠ sources differ — GIFT: tree · TRY: Hemi-epiphyte
Woodinesswoody
Physiology & chemistry3
Photosynthetic pathwayC3
Specific leaf area (SLA)12.37 mm²/mg
Wood density542 mg/cm³
05DNA & barcoding5 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ficus retusa has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens5
Marker genes3
eDNA detections5
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL★rbcLa
plant barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB · GoaT · TreeOfSex
The complete instruction manualFicus retusa carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size684 600 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Ficus retusa0.68 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy86% within 1 km
≤100 m 6>10 km 1
7 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor8
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy57% within 1 km
≤100 m 22≤1 km 3≤10 km 16>10 km 3
44 georeferenced · 149 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence193
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions32 of 49 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Taipei, TW
34
Bronx, US
21
Taipei, TW
10
Durango, MX
8
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
7
Mérida, MX
6
Wuhan, CN
4
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
4
Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Moreloslocation not on record
3
Guilin, CN
3
Miami, US
3
Long Beach, US
3
Kew, GB
3
Tapachula, MX
3
EL PASO, US
2
URCAlocation not on record
2
Beijing, CN
2
Centro Cultural Santo Domingolocation not on record
2
Mexico City, MX
1
Dehra Dun, IN
1
Paris, FR
1
Barcelona, ES
1
Phoenix, US
1
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
1
Claremont, US
1
Saint Louis, US
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Corporación Autónoma Regional Para la Defensa de la Meseta de Bucaramanga (CDMB)location not on record
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
San Diego, US
1
Universidad de Caldas (UCaldas)location not on record
1
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
1
Maringá, BR
1
Nanjing, CN
1
Universidad Industrial de Santander (UIS)location not on record
1
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
1
Beijing, CN
1
Giardini Botanici Hanburylocation not on record
1
Granada, ES
1
Guangzhou, CN
1
ASUlocation not on record
1
Adelaide, AU
1
St. Paul, US
1
Alexandria Universitylocation not on record
1
Lake Charles, US
1
College of the Atlantic, Museumlocation not on record
1
Natural History Museum, Tribhuvan Universitylocation not on record
1
Vancouver, CA
1
Chapingo, MX
1
49 institutions · 151 of 193 vouchered records shown · 41 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA5 detections
Where the DNA of Ficus retusa was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found5
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 5 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median25.5 °C 25.5–25.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter11.3 °C
Max temp (day)26.7 °C
Min temp (night)24.2 °C
Precipitation0.1 mm/mo
Air humidity63.6 %
Vapour deficit1,182 Pa
Cloud cover4.90 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.