A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ficus luschnathiana has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens13
Marker genes6
eDNA detections17
Countries3
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★rbcL★rbcLa★trnL-F★ITS★ITS2trnH-psbA
plant barcodefungal barcodemarker
07Deep time~6.48 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin6.48 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 796 records
Wild obs. + sensor441
Museum / vouchered1 213
Cultivated / captive1
Other141
Origin
Native510
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 276 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy90% within 1 km
≤100 m 202≤1 km 71≤10 km 26>10 km 5
304 georeferenced · 137 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor441
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy25% within 1 km
≤100 m 2≤1 km 2≤10 km 3>10 km 9
16 georeferenced · 1 197 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 213
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions35 of 101 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Blumenau, BR
148
Porto Alegre, BR
91
Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
77
JBRJlocation not on record
77
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
72
Bronx, US
71
USP-IBlocation not on record
42
Saint Louis, US
37
IPA/SPlocation not on record
35
UNICAMPlocation not on record
35
Universidade Federale do Rio Grande do Sullocation not on record
34
Chicago, US
33
Foz do Iguaçu, BR
30
Corrientes, AR
25
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
21
UTFPR-CPlocation not on record
21
San Isidro, AR
18
Istituto Agrario Castelnuovolocation not on record
17
FUVATESlocation not on record
16
UNIVILLElocation not on record
14
Campo Mourão, BR
13
UNESClocation not on record
13
Criciúma, BR
12
UFMSlocation not on record
12
Cenargenlocation not on record
11
Brasília, BR
11
Kew, GB
8
Londrina, BR
7
Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeirolocation not on record
7
UFPRlocation not on record
7
Paleontological Collectionlocation not on record
6
Paris, FR
6
Universidade de São Paulolocation not on record
6
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus do Pantanallocation not on record
6
Centro de Pesquisas Agropecuarias do Tropico Umidolocation not on record
6
ASUlocation not on record
5
Salvador, BR
5
Centro de Estudios y Colecciones Biológicas para la Conservaciónlocation not on record
5
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
5
Universidad Nacional de Asunciónlocation not on record
5
South Kensington, GB
5
UTFPR-SLlocation not on record
4
ESALQlocation not on record
4
Stockholm, SE
4
Brasília, BR
4
Cascavel, BR
4
UEMlocation not on record
4
IAPlocation not on record
3
Centro de Ecologia Aplicada del Litoral (CECOAL-CONICET-UNNE)location not on record
3
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chilelocation not on record
3
UFRRJlocation not on record
3
Maringá, BR
3
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
3
PUC-RSlocation not on record
3
UTFPR-DVlocation not on record
3
UFBAlocation not on record
3
UNESP-RClocation not on record
3
UFESlocation not on record
2
UFSClocation not on record
2
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paranálocation not on record
2
Santa Maria, BR
2
UFMGlocation not on record
2
Lake Charles, US
2
UNESP-IBILCElocation not on record
2
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
2
PUC-RIOlocation not on record
2
UDESC-CAVlocation not on record
2
UNESP-FCAlocation not on record
2
UNESP, Campus São José Rio Prêtolocation not on record
2
Cuiabá, BR
2
Feira de Santana, BR
2
Federal University of Espírito Santolocation not on record
2
UNISANTAlocation not on record
2
Glocation not on record
2
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
2
UFABClocation not on record
1
Ural Federal University "B. N. Yeltsin"location not on record
1
Chaguaramas, TT
1
Universidade Paulistalocation not on record
1
Tampa, US
1
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
1
UnBlocation not on record
1
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paranálocation not on record
1
UFVJMlocation not on record
1
Seropédica, BR
1
Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeirolocation not on record
1
URCAlocation not on record
1
Museo y Jardin Botanico Prof. Atilio Lombardolocation not on record
1
Bogotá, D.C., CO
1
Mississippi State, US
1
Institut fur Allgemeine Mikrobiologielocation not on record
1
Universidad Nacional de Misiones- CONICETlocation not on record
1
UFSCarlocation not on record
1
Cruz das Almas, BR
1
UEMAlocation not on record
1
Museo y Jardín Botánico - Intendencia de Montevideolocation not on record
1
Masindi, UG
1
Claremont, US
1
Uberlândia, BR
1
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
1
Pelotas, BR
1
101 institutions · 1 191 of 1 213 vouchered records shown · 22 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA17 detections
Where the DNA of Ficus luschnathiana was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found17
Studies independent surveys2
Countries2
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 17 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median21.0 °C 18.0–21.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter12.3 °C
Max temp (day)25.9 °C 22.2–25.9
Min temp (night)16.1 °C 14.2–16.7
Precipitation167 mm/mo 134–189
Air humidity58.7 % 58.7–61.8
Moisture balance9.90 mm/mo 9.90–77.9
Vapour deficit1,021 Pa 785–1,021
Wind speed4.70 m/s 3.70–4.70
Cloud cover36.6 % 32.4–36.6
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 14 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.