Compounds documented for Ficus erecta across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile1 class
Pyrrolizidine alkaloids3
Documented compounds3 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
Integerrimine
present
NPASS
Retrorsine
present
NPASS
Senecionine
present
NPASS
05DNA & barcoding38 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ficus erecta has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens38
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections55
Countries3
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Ficus erecta var. erecta TF<JPN>:Tod13307 chloroplast rbcL gene for ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit, partial cds
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL10★ITS★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB · GoaT · TreeOfSex · NCBI
The complete instruction manualFicus erecta carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈595 834 738 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Ficus erecta0.60 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelContig
Completeness97.9% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 652 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 558
Museum / vouchered878
Cultivated / captive3
Other213
Origin
Native7
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 540 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy88% within 1 km
≤100 m 517≤1 km 99≤10 km 44>10 km 42
702 georeferenced · 856 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 558
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy48% within 1 km
≤100 m 2≤1 km 38≤10 km 40>10 km 4
84 georeferenced · 794 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence878
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 3 records without
Open the mapnot free-living3
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions44 of 75 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Kunming, CN
157
Sanda, JP
105
Odawara, JP
67
Central China Normal Universitylocation not on record
58
Chiba, JP
50
KR
38
Herbarium of the Department of Botany, University of Tokyolocation not on record
26
Yangling, CN
21
Taipei, TW
18
Nagano City, JP
17
Elocation not on record
16
Guangxi Institute of Traditional Medical and Pharmaceutical Scienceslocation not on record
16
FFPRIlocation not on record
15
Universidad Católica de Santa Maríalocation not on record
15
NSMKlocation not on record
14
Bando, JP
14
Osaka, JP
13
Zhejiang Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
13
Taipei, TW
12
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
10
Hiratsuka City Museumlocation not on record
10
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
7
Kochi, JP
7
Guangzhou, CN
6
“Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University" NPLClocation not on record
6
SCAUlocation not on record
6
Beijing, CN
6
Kyoto Universitylocation not on record
6
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
5
Xiamen, CN
5
Sagamihara, JP
5
Shanghai, CN
4
Institute for Agricultural Bacteriology and Fermentation Biologylocation not on record
4
Cambridge, US
4
KOMlocation not on record
4
Tomioka, JP
4
Auckland, NZ
3
KURAlocation not on record
3
Hangzhou Normal Collegelocation not on record
3
nlocation not on record
3
Kew, GB
3
Fort Worth, US
3
Parthenon Tama History Museumlocation not on record
2
Bronx, US
2
Herbarium of South China Botanical Gardenlocation not on record
2
Kawasaki Shi Tama Ku, JP
2
Museum Of Natural And Environmental History, Shizuokalocation not on record
2
Angwin, US
2
Fukushima Universitylocation not on record
2
Beijing, CN
2
Riverside, US
2
KNAMlocation not on record
2
Nanyue Arboretumlocation not on record
2
Guilin, CN
1
Mount Annan, AU
1
Guiyang, CN
1
Guiyang, CN
1
KIRMlocation not on record
1
Wlocation not on record
1
Oiso Municipal Museumlocation not on record
1
Guangzhou, CN
1
Shanghai, CN
1
Hangzhou, CN
1
Berlin, DE
1
Canberra, AU
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
Zhejiang Universitylocation not on record
1
Nanjing, CN
1
EL PASO, US
1
Nanjing, CN
1
Taipei, TW
1
Uppsala, SE
1
Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Gardenlocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
1
75 institutions · 846 of 878 vouchered records shown · 15 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA55 detections
Where the DNA of Ficus erecta was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found55
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 55 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.0 °C 7.40–22.9
Seasonal swing summer↔winter25.4 °C
Max temp (day)15.8 °C 9.60–25.5
Min temp (night)5.00 °C 3.00–20.5
Precipitation250 mm/mo 12.8–344
Air humidity62.0 % 45.7–65.1
Moisture balance165 mm/mo
Vapour deficit808 Pa 428–1,085
Wind speed3.00 m/s
Cloud cover39.2 % 22.3–44.6
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 38 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.