A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ficus asperifolia has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens4
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences3
eDNA detections3
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcLa★ITS3★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
07Deep time~8.82 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin8.82 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 167 records
Wild obs. + sensor284
Museum / vouchered782
Other101
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 832 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy97% within 1 km
≤100 m 30>10 km 1
31 georeferenced · 253 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor284
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy67% within 1 km
≤100 m 5≤1 km 3≤10 km 3>10 km 1
12 georeferenced · 770 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence782
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions16 of 54 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
MeiseBGlocation not on record
133
Saint Louis, US
81
Yaoundé, CM
60
Kew, GB
39
LBVlocation not on record
35
Embrapa Agrobiology Diazothrophic Microbial Culture Collectionlocation not on record
34
WAGlocation not on record
33
Plocation not on record
26
BRLUlocation not on record
25
HNBlocation not on record
15
Herbier National du Gabonlocation not on record
12
Université du Lomélocation not on record
10
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
9
CNF-UFHBlocation not on record
8
Pretoria, ZA
7
Dresden, DE
7
Institute for Agricultural Research of Mozambiquelocation not on record
5
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
4
Brussels, BE
4
Paris, FR
4
Berlin, DE
4
Ulocation not on record
4
IPHAMETRAlocation not on record
4
Forestry Research Institute of Nigerialocation not on record
3
MAlocation not on record
3
Bergen, NO
3
Glocation not on record
3
Coimbra, PT
3
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique / Institut de l'environnement et de recherches agricoleslocation not on record
3
LISClocation not on record
3
Institut de Recherche Agronomique de Guinée (IRAG)location not on record
3
Uppsala, SE
3
TAFORI-LSRClocation not on record
3
Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoirelocation not on record
2
LDlocation not on record
2
University of Santo Tomas Museumlocation not on record
2
Stockholm, SE
2
University of Hamburglocation not on record
2
Clocation not on record
2
Mlocation not on record
2
Frankfurt am Main
1
Llocation not on record
1
Arusha, TZ
1
Miami, US
1
EAlocation not on record
1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
Elocation not on record
1
Goucher Collegelocation not on record
1
DSMlocation not on record
1
Université National du Béninlocation not on record
1
Herbarium of the Department of Botany, University of Tokyolocation not on record
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
Leiden University Medical Centerlocation not on record
1
Daubeny Herbarium, Oxfordlocation not on record
1
54 institutions · 621 of 782 vouchered records shown · 161 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA3 detections
Where the DNA of Ficus asperifolia was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found3
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 3 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median25.2 °C 25.2–25.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter2.90 °C
Max temp (day)29.9 °C
Min temp (night)21.8 °C
Precipitation179 mm/mo
Air humidity67.7 %
Moisture balance44.7 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,041 Pa
Wind speed1.20 m/s
Cloud cover24.9 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.