Felicia amelloides, la Pâquerette bleue ou Marguerite du Cap, est une espèce de plante à fleurs de la famille des Astéracées. C'est une plante herbacée originaire d'Afrique du Sud.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Felicia amelloides has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens1
Marker genes1
eDNA detections1
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type354 records
Wild obs. + sensor257
Museum / vouchered96
Cultivated / captive1
Origin
Introduced56
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO824 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy96% within 1 km
≤100 m 128≤1 km 78≤10 km 2>10 km 6
214 georeferenced · 43 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor257
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy72% within 1 km
≤100 m 3≤1 km 20≤10 km 8>10 km 1
32 georeferenced · 64 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence96
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions28 of 41 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Pretoria, ZA
29
Cape Town, ZA
10
Auckland, NZ
5
Mount Annan, AU
4
Christchurch, NZ
3
Parkville, AU
3
Barcelona, ES
2
ASUlocation not on record
2
Vitoria, ES
2
Irvine, US
2
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
2
MeiseBGlocation not on record
2
Wellington, NZ
2
Salamanca, ES
1
Bloomington, US
1
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
1
Turlock, US
1
Riverside, US
1
Catalina Island Conservancylocation not on record
1
US
1
Phyletisches Museum Jenalocation not on record
1
CJBGlocation not on record
1
Philadelphia, US
1
John T. Waterhouse Herbariumlocation not on record
1
La Paz, BO
1
Hobart, AU
1
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
1
Montréal, CA
1
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
1
Alicante, ES
1
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
1
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
1
Granada, ES
1
College of the Atlantic, Museumlocation not on record
1
València, ES
1
Pamplona, ES
1
Canberra, AU
1
Bangkok, TH
1
Madrid, ES
1
Bronx, US
1
Denver, US
1
41 institutions · 96 of 96 vouchered records shown
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Felicia amelloides was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
