Falco peregrinus
Tunstall, 1771 · speciesAt a glance
Sources11 archives
Databases and archives Falco peregrinus's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation19 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 662 193 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI79 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics115 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
Paleobiology DatabasePBDB consortiumfossil record↗
WikidataWikimedia Foundationstructured facts↗
IOC World Bird ListIOCbird checklist↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
The peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus), also known as the peregrine, and historically as the duck hawk in North America, is a cosmopolitan bird of prey (raptor) in the family Falconidae. A large, crow-sized falcon, it has a blue-grey back, barred white underparts, and a black head. The peregrine is renowned for its speed, reaching up to 200 mph during its characteristic hunting stoop (high-speed dive), making it the fastest bird in the world, as well as the fastest member of the animal kingdom. According to a National Geographic TV program, the highest measured speed of a peregrine falcon is 389 km/h. As is typical for bird-eating raptors, peregrine falcons are sexually dimorphic, with females being considerably larger than males. The peregrine's breeding range includes land regions from the Arctic tundra to the tropics. It can be found nearly everywhere on Earth, except extreme polar regions, very high mountains, and most tropical rainforests; the only major ice-free landmass from which it is entirely absent is New Zealand. This makes it the world's most widespread raptor, and one of the most widely found bird species. In fact, the only land-based bird species found over a larger geographic area is not always naturally occurring, but one widely introduced by humans, the rock pigeon, which in turn now supports many peregrine populations as a prey species. The peregrine is a highly successful example of urban wildlife in much of its range, taking advantage of tall buildings as nest sites and an abundance of prey such as pigeons and ducks. Both the English and scientific names of this species mean "wandering falcon," referring to the migratory habits of many northern populations. Experts recognize 17 to 19 subspecies, which vary in appearance and range; disagreement exists over whether the distinctive Barbary falcon is represented by two subspecies of Falco peregrinus, or is a separate species, F. pelegrinoides. The two species' divergence is relatively recent, during the time of the last ice age, therefore the genetic differential between them (and also the difference in their appearance) is relatively tiny. They are only about 0.6–0.8% genetically differentiated. Although its diet consists almost exclusively of medium-sized birds, the peregrine will sometimes hunt small mammals, small reptiles, or even insects. Reaching sexual maturity at one year, it mates for life and nests in a scrape, normally on cliff edges or, in recent times, on tall human-made structures. The peregrine falcon became an endangered species in many areas because of the widespread use of certain pesticides, especially DDT. Since the ban on DDT from the early 1970s, populations have recovered, supported by large-scale protection of nesting places and releases to the wild. The peregrine falcon is a well-respected falconry bird due to its strong hunting ability, high trainability, versatility, and availability via captive breeding. It is effective on most game bird species, from small to large. It has also been used as a religious, royal, or national symbol across multiple eras and areas of human civilization.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology14
Life cycle & reproduction11
Diet & foraging10
Habitat & environment4
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Falco peregrinus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
Besides the big genome in the nucleus, cells carry a small, circular loop of DNA inside the cell's energy factories — the mitochondria. It is inherited almost only from the mother and is a leftover from ancient bacteria that moved into the cell. The mitochondrial markers above (ND*, COX, CYTB…) are read from exactly this loop. Outer ring = one strand, inner ring = the other.
The complete instruction manual Falco peregrinus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The solid bar is the fossil range: the span between the oldest and the youngest fossil that palaeontologists have assigned to Falco peregrinus. Above itBeside it, the bars count how many dated finds fall in each slice of time; the tallest bar is labelled, and heights use a square-root scale so that thin slices stay visible next to rich ones. Read this as how well each stretch of time is preserved and studied — thick bars mean plenty of the right kind of rock and plenty of collectors, which is related to, but not the same as, how common it actually was. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
The two clocks disagree here. The fossil record reaches back to 2.58 Ma, but the molecular clock dates the lineage to only 0.46 Ma — about 2.12 Myr younger. A fossil cannot be older than the lineage it belongs to, so one of the two is off: either the fossil is assigned to the wrong species, or the clock is running fast.
How it livedPBDB
Record type2 662 222 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions57 of 114 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| University of Wyoming Museum of Vertebrateslocation not on record | 1 426 |
| Seattle, US | 250 |
| Helsinki, FI | 226 |
| Chicago, US | 153 |
| Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record | 117 |
| Australian National Wildlife Collectionlocation not on record | 116 |
| Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State Universitylocation not on record | 82 |
| Salzburg, AT | 67 |
| Kristiansand, NO | 64 |
| Tacoma, US | 62 |
| Denver, US | 45 |
| München, DE | 45 |
| Paris, FR | 41 |
| US | 41 |
| Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record | 33 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 33 |
| Barcelona, ES | 32 |
| Liverpool, GB | 31 |
| Royal Saskatchewan Museumlocation not on record | 31 |
| Copenhagen, DK | 27 |
| NSMKlocation not on record | 27 |
| Museums Victorialocation not on record | 26 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 24 |
| Cambridge, US | 24 |
| Washington State University, Charles R. Conner Museumlocation not on record | 23 |
| Sydney, AU | 23 |
| Brussels, BE | 23 |
| Edmonton, CA | 18 |
| Albany, US | 18 |
| San Diego, US | 17 |
| Stockholm, SE | 16 |
| Tasmanian Museum & Art Gallerylocation not on record | 15 |
| RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record | 15 |
| IMEDEAlocation not on record | 12 |
| Buenos Aires, AR | 12 |
| Texas Cooperative Wildlife Collectionlocation not on record | 12 |
| Oulu, FI | 11 |
| CASlocation not on record | 11 |
| Natick, US | 11 |
| Geneva, CH | 10 |
| University of California Los Angeleslocation not on record | 10 |
| CBDClocation not on record | 9 |
| Wuzhou, CN | 9 |
| Delaware Museum of Nature and Sciencelocation not on record | 8 |
| University of Nebraska State Museumlocation not on record | 8 |
| Bergen, NO | 8 |
| Tromsø, NO | 8 |
| Natural History Museum, Aarhus Denmarklocation not on record | 7 |
| QVMAGlocation not on record | 7 |
| EL PASO, US | 7 |
| Moore Laboratory of Zoology, Occidental Collegelocation not on record | 7 |
| Louisiana State University, Museum of Zoologylocation not on record | 7 |
| Philadelphia, US | 6 |
| Kuopio, FI | 6 |
| Washington, US | 6 |
| SMNHTAUlocation not on record | 5 |
| DOI/NPS, Salem Maritime National Historic Sitelocation not on record | 5 |
| Vancouver, CA | 5 |
| Tilburg, NL | 5 |
| Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeirolocation not on record | 4 |
| Frankfurt am Main | 4 |
| Ithaca, US | 4 |
| Los Angeles, US | 4 |
| Durango, MX | 4 |
| Western Australian Museumlocation not on record | 4 |
| ASNHClocation not on record | 4 |
| South Kensington, GB | 4 |
| MZLUlocation not on record | 4 |
| Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX | 3 |
| Chongqing Museumlocation not on record | 3 |
| Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 3 |
| Honolulu, US | 3 |
| Chicago, US | 3 |
| Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology UB RASlocation not on record | 2 |
| New Haven, US | 2 |
| Zografou, GR | 2 |
| National Museum of Natural Sciencelocation not on record | 2 |
| University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record | 2 |
| Tall Timbers Research Stationlocation not on record | 2 |
| Universidad Católica de Manizaleslocation not on record | 2 |
| Berkeley, US | 2 |
| NSW Dept of Planning, Industry and Environmentlocation not on record | 2 |
| Gothenburg, SE | 2 |
| Zacatecas, MX | 2 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 2 |
| Naturalis Biodiversity Centerlocation not on record | 1 |
| St. Paul, US | 1 |
| CPMMlocation not on record | 1 |
| EEZAlocation not on record | 1 |
| Iowa City, US | 1 |
| BG-NMNHSlocation not on record | 1 |
| Musée des Confluenceslocation not on record | 1 |
| Philip L. Wright Zoological Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Citadel Hill, GB | 1 |
| Forssa, FI | 1 |
| Rovaniemi, FI | 1 |
| Museo de Historia Natural Alfredo Dugés, Universidad de Guanajuatolocation not on record | 1 |
| Zoologisches Museum Hamburglocation not on record | 1 |
| Universidad del Valle (UniValle)location not on record | 1 |
| Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 1 |
| Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record | 1 |
| TMPMlocation not on record | 1 |
| Bourges, FR | 1 |
| Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record | 1 |
| Bonn, DE | 1 |
| KU Leuvenlocation not on record | 1 |
| Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipaslocation not on record | 1 |
| Tapachula, MX | 1 |
| Ohio State University - Bird Division, Columbus, OH (OSUM)location not on record | 1 |
| Canadian Wildlife Servicelocation not on record | 1 |
| Auckland, NZ | 1 |
| Universidad de Caldas (UCaldas)location not on record | 1 |
| Winterthur, CH | 1 |
| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record | 1 |
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Where the DNA of Falco peregrinus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.