Der Kandisbraune Drüsling (Exidia saccharina), früher auch als Zucker-Gallertpilz bekannt, ist eine zerstreut verbreitete Pilzart der Tremellomycetes aus der Familie der Ohrlappenpilzverwandte (Auriculariaceae). Er zersetzt abgestorbene Äste und Stämme von Nadelgehölzen, insbesondere Kiefer und Fichte.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Exidia saccharina has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes2
eDNA detections14
Countries9
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 966 records
Wild obs. + sensor2 446
Museum / vouchered509
Other11
Origin
Native15
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO8 940 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy80% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 319≤1 km 476≤10 km 389>10 km 51
2 235 georeferenced · 211 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 446
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy58% within 1 km
≤100 m 39≤1 km 126≤10 km 80>10 km 40
285 georeferenced · 224 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence509
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions33 of 58 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
85
Olocation not on record
56
Tartu, EE
38
Uppsala, SE
35
Copenhagen, DK
20
Toronto, CA
11
WU-MYClocation not on record
11
Karlsruhe, DE
9
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
9
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
7
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
7
Görlitz, DE
7
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
6
Baton Rouge, US
6
Pullman, US
6
Trondheim, NO
5
Kew, GB
5
GJOlocation not on record
5
Chicago, US
5
Joensuu, FI
5
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
4
Oulu, FI
4
BDBClocation not on record
4
MAlocation not on record
4
CJBGlocation not on record
3
San Sebastián, ES
3
Jyväskylä, FI
3
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
3
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
3
Vitoria, ES
3
Philadelphia, US
2
TENN-Flocation not on record
2
ILLSlocation not on record
2
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
2
PHlocation not on record
2
LDlocation not on record
2
Staten Island, US
2
Turku, FI
2
Berlin, DE
2
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
2
Warsaw, PL
2
Trondheim, NO
2
Gijón, ES
1
CA
1
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
1
Bardejov, SK
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
Metsähallituslocation not on record
1
Mlocation not on record
1
Champaign, US
1
Laramie, US
1
Chapel Hill, US
1
Kuopio, FI
1
DPIlocation not on record
1
Madison, US
1
St. Paul, US
1
TROMlocation not on record
1
Denver, US
1
58 institutions · 412 of 509 vouchered records shown · 97 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA14 detections
Where the DNA of Exidia saccharina was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found14
Studies independent surveys4
Countries9
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 14 detections have coordinates
Open the map9 countries0
NeotropicAfrotropicAustralasia
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median16.5 °C 4.90–24.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter17.1 °C
Max temp (day)21.6 °C 10.7–26.7
Min temp (night)11.6 °C 1.00–22.0
Precipitation107 mm/mo 70.0–287
Air humidity61.0 % 55.3–70.5
Moisture balance23.9 mm/mo -50.3–160
Vapour deficit773 Pa 381–982
Wind speed2.90 m/s 2.50–3.30
Cloud cover39.1 % 34.4–53.7
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 12 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation2 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 966 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI14 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗