Euthamia caroliniana, known as Carolina grass-leaved goldenrod or slender goldentop is a flowering plant in the genus Euthamia, a member of the family Asteraceae. It is listed as Vulnerable due to habitat loss and disturbance within its range.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Euthamia caroliniana across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Euthamia caroliniana has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens9
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections6
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK3★rbcL4★rbcLa★ITS3★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type3 621 records
Wild obs. + sensor2 438
Museum / vouchered1 183
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO9 192 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy85% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 508≤1 km 224≤10 km 87>10 km 213
2 032 georeferenced · 406 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 438
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy33% within 1 km
≤100 m 68≤1 km 121≤10 km 303>10 km 73
565 georeferenced · 618 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 183
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions40 of 70 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Chapel Hill, US
216
US
130
Tampa, US
107
Bangkok, TH
71
Ann Arbor, US
64
Bronx, US
37
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
32
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
31
Jackson, US
30
Columbia, US
28
Philadelphia, US
25
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
25
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
23
Tempe, US
21
Tall Timbers Research Stationlocation not on record
17
GAlocation not on record
16
New Haven, US
16
University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record
14
Burlington, US
13
Madison, US
12
Montréal, CA
12
Bloomington, US
12
Tuscaloosa, US
10
University of New Hampshirelocation not on record
9
Mount Pleasant, US
9
College Park, US
8
DOI/NPS, Mississippi National River & Recreation Arealocation not on record
7
AUAlocation not on record
7
Chicago, US
7
Clemson, US
7
Wuzhou, CN
5
Denver, US
5
EL PASO, US
5
Williamsburg, US
5
Saint Louis, US
4
Philadelphia, US
4
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
4
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
3
Lord Fairfax Community Collegelocation not on record
3
Wlocation not on record
3
New Brunswick, US
3
Dover, US
3
Maryland Department of Natural Resourceslocation not on record
3
Staten Island, US
2
Québec, CA
2
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
2
Mississippi State, US
2
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
2
Riverside, US
2
Audubon Society -- Silver Bluff Audubon Center and Sanctuarylocation not on record
2
University of South Carolina Salkehatchielocation not on record
2
Weymouth Woods Sandhills Nature Preservelocation not on record
2
Tulane Universitylocation not on record
1
St. Paul, US
1
Florida Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
1
Whitehorse, CA
1
Northridge, US
1
Columbus State Universitylocation not on record
1
China Agricultural Universitylocation not on record
1
James F. Matthews Center for Biodiversity Studieslocation not on record
1
Taipei, TW
1
BAYLUlocation not on record
1
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
1
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
1
Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record
1
Miami, US
1
Fredericksburg, US
1
Toronto, CA
1
Kingston, US
1
Research Collection of B. A. Bennettlocation not on record
1
70 institutions · 1 102 of 1 183 vouchered records shown · 81 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Euthamia caroliniana was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median16.7 °C 15.5–17.9
Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.7 °C
Max temp (day)21.9 °C 20.1–23.7
Min temp (night)13.1 °C 12.4–13.7
Precipitation95.2 mm/mo 79.8–111
Air humidity60.6 % 58.9–62.4
Moisture balance10.9 mm/mo -8.20–30.0
Vapour deficit751 Pa 661–840
Wind speed2.40 m/s 2.30–2.40
Cloud cover36.4 % 34.9–37.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.