Эуптелея многотычинковая — дерево, реже кустарник, вид рода Эуптелея (Euptelea) семейства Эуптелейные (Eupteleaceae). Изящное дерево с красивой листвой осенью. В природе ареал вида охватывает Японию. В Россию интродуцировано в конце XIX века.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Euptelea polyandra across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
💊 Medicinal use documented
Compound class profile5 classes
Oleanane triterpenoids48
Lupane triterpenoids11
Oleanane triterpenoids $ Ursane and Taraxastane triterpenoids5
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Euptelea polyandra has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens43
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections22
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Euptelea polyandra TF<JPN>:TW021125 chloroplast rbcL gene for ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit, partial cds
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL10★ITStrnH-psbA
plant barcodefungal barcodemarker
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualEuptelea polyandra carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 283×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-fedorov
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Morawetz, W. & M. R. A. Samuel. 1989. Karyological patterns in the Hamamelidae. Syst. Assoc. Special Vol. 40(2): 131–135.
CCDB · book-fedorov — Sugiura 1931, 1936b
CCDB · book-fedorov — Whitaker 1933a
07Deep time~6.01 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin6.01 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 544 records
Wild obs. + sensor131
Museum / vouchered1 405
Cultivated / captive8
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 848 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy38% within 1 km
≤100 m 38≤1 km 3≤10 km 22>10 km 46
109 georeferenced · 22 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor131
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy14% within 1 km
≤100 m 1≤1 km 27≤10 km 170
198 georeferenced · 1 207 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 405
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km
≤1 km 1
1 georeferenced · 7 without coordinates
Open the mapnot free-living8
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions34 of 59 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Tsukuba, JP
300
Odawara, JP
174
Shinshu Universitylocation not on record
95
Nagano City, JP
89
Sanda, JP
87
Toyama, JP
72
Kochi, JP
60
Tomioka, JP
48
Nagatoro-machi, Chichibu-gun, JP
47
Osaka, JP
46
Chiba, JP
40
FFPRIlocation not on record
38
Bando, JP
33
KURAlocation not on record
32
Sagamihara, JP
26
Sugadaira Research Station, Mountain Science Center, University of Tsukubalocation not on record
20
Forestry and Forest Products Research Institutelocation not on record
16
Fukushima Universitylocation not on record
15
Saint Louis, US
15
Universidad Católica de Santa Maríalocation not on record
12
Toyota city nature sanctuarylocation not on record
12
Sendai, JP
10
Omachi Alpine Museumlocation not on record
9
KOMlocation not on record
8
Edinburgh, GB
7
Nishihara, JP
7
Hokkaido University Museumlocation not on record
5
LDlocation not on record
4
Beijing, CN
3
Parthenon Tama History Museumlocation not on record
3
Tokushima, JP
3
Museum Of Natural And Environmental History, Shizuokalocation not on record
3
Fort Worth, US
3
WTUlocation not on record
2
Ishikawa Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
2
Minia, EG
1
BAYLUlocation not on record
1
Philadelphia, US
1
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
1
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
1
Wlocation not on record
1
Bronx, US
1
Taipei, TW
1
Rotorua, NZ
1
Nishihara, JP
1
IPA/SPlocation not on record
1
JP
1
South Kensington, GB
1
Angwin, US
1
Bloomington, US
1
CASlocation not on record
1
Bangkok, TH
1
J.F.Oberlin Universitylocation not on record
1
Millersville, US
1
Boise, US
1
Otaru, JP
1
Burlington, US
1
Akita Prefectural Museumlocation not on record
1
JBRJlocation not on record
1
59 institutions · 1 370 of 1 405 vouchered records shown · 34 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA22 detections
Where the DNA of Euptelea polyandra was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found22
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 22 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median20.9 °C 11.3–24.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter23.0 °C
Max temp (day)23.1 °C 14.4–27.4
Min temp (night)16.2 °C 6.90–20.5
Precipitation295 mm/mo 226–397
Air humidity65.7 % 62.8–67.7
Moisture balance162 mm/mo 91.3–273
Vapour deficit840 Pa 484–1,029
Wind speed2.50 m/s 1.50–3.00
Cloud cover43.5 % 36.5–48.6
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 17 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.