Euphrosyne partheniifolia

DC. · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Plantae/Tracheophyta/Magnoliopsida/Asterales/Asteraceae/Euphrosyne

At a glance

Occurrence records133

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens1

eDNA detections1

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Euphrosyne partheniifolia's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility133 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics1 specimens↗

NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Occurrence & distributionGBIF133 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD · NCBI1 specimens

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding1 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Euphrosyne partheniifolia has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens1

Marker genes1

GenBank sequences1

eDNA detections1

Countries1

The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species

ITSMH984895.1 ↗752 bpMexico · 1973

ACGT

TCGAACCCTGCACAGCAGAACGACCCGTGAACAAGTAAAAACACCGGCCGAGCAGGGATTGAAGCTTATGTTTTGATCCTTGTGAGGCCT …

Euphrosyne partheniifolia isolate X72 internal transcribed spacer 1, partial sequence; 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★ITS1

fungal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type133 records

Wild obs. + sensor5

Museum / vouchered112

Other16

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO372 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤1 km 1

2 georeferenced · 3 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor5

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy96% within 1 km

≤100 m 95≤1 km 3≤10 km 4

102 georeferenced · 10 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence112

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions10 of 12 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Mexico City, MX	33
Durango, MX	27
Zacatecas, MX	25
Mexico City, MX	10
Austin, US	6
Juriquilla, MX	4
Guasave, MX	2
Austin, US	1
Lubbock, US	1
MeiseBGlocation not on record	1
Saint Louis, US	1
ASUlocation not on record	1

12 institutions · 112 of 112 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Euphrosyne partheniifolia was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)