A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Euphorbia davidii has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens10
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections5
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Euphorbia davidii voucher CCDB-24801-C08 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL2★rbcLa★ITS7★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualEuphorbia davidii carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size2 014 680 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Euphorbia davidii2.01 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 56 n = 28
Ploidypolyploid inferred
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 561×CCDB · iapt
CCDB · iapt — IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 22
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin12 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 610 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 303
Museum / vouchered1 293
Other14
Origin
Native14
Introduced78
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO8 024 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy84% within 1 km
≤100 m 739≤1 km 117≤10 km 79>10 km 88
1 023 georeferenced · 280 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 303
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy40% within 1 km
≤100 m 103≤1 km 222≤10 km 390>10 km 89
804 georeferenced · 489 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 293
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions58 of 85 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Wuzhou, CN
374
Bronx, US
82
Albuquerque, US
73
Madison, US
71
Austin, US
48
Denver, US
46
Ann Arbor, US
45
Fort Worth, US
37
Bloomington, US
36
Chadron, US
31
Mount Annan, AU
30
St. Paul, US
29
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
25
Saint Louis, US
23
BIO-UNIPIlocation not on record
18
Pittsburg, US
17
Brisbane, AU
17
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
14
Córdoba, AR
14
Claremont, US
13
Provo, US
13
Flagstaff, US
12
BDBClocation not on record
12
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
9
Fairfax, US
8
Logan, US
8
Lincoln, US
7
Guasave, MX
7
EL PASO, US
7
Chapel Hill, US
7
Pomona Collegelocation not on record
6
Austin, US
6
Missoula, US
6
Montréal, CA
6
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
5
Canberra, AU
5
Adelaide, AU
5
GB
5
Chicago, US
5
Millersville, US
4
Toronto, CA
4
Davis, US
4
Lubbock, US
4
US
4
Armidale, AU
3
Williamsburg, US
3
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
3
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
2
CASlocation not on record
2
ASUlocation not on record
2
Durango, US
2
Riverside, US
2
Springfield, US
2
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
2
IDElocation not on record
2
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
2
Whitehorse, CA
2
BRNUlocation not on record
2
New Brunswick, US
2
Columbia, US
2
Durango, MX
1
Henderson, US
1
Bureau of Land Management, Caliente Field Officelocation not on record
1
BClocation not on record
1
Hobart, AU
1
NSW Dept of Planning, Industry and Environmentlocation not on record
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Minia, EG
1
San Luis Obispo, US
1
Barcelona, ES
1
Hermosillo, MX
1
Tempe, US
1
Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahualocation not on record
1
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
1
DOI/NPS, Selma to Montgomery National Historic Traillocation not on record
1
Wlocation not on record
1
New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Sciencelocation not on record
1
Chicago, US
1
LDlocation not on record
1
Bozeman, US
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Boise, US
1
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
1
Moscow, US
1
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canadalocation not on record
1
85 institutions · 1 262 of 1 293 vouchered records shown · 31 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA5 detections
Where the DNA of Euphorbia davidii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found5
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 5 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
wate ground, with melilotus, Euphorbia macul…sandy lake Erie beachgravel edge of railway tracks
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median22.7 °C 22.7–22.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter27.6 °C
Max temp (day)25.2 °C
Min temp (night)21.0 °C
Precipitation89.4 mm/mo
Air humidity60.1 %
Moisture balance-63.4 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,100 Pa
Wind speed3.50 m/s
Cloud cover36.4 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.