A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Erysiphe heraclei has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens25
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections25
Countries5
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Erysiphe heraclei isolate KMUH-55 small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1, 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type8 237 records
Wild obs. + sensor6 830
Museum / vouchered1 370
Other37
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO14 124 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy22% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 145≤1 km 266≤10 km 4 970>10 km 27
6 408 georeferenced · 422 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor6 830
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy50% within 1 km
≤100 m 49≤1 km 144≤10 km 146>10 km 49
388 georeferenced · 982 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 370
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions23 of 47 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Görlitz, DE
259
Mlocation not on record
246
Karlsruhe, DE
138
Helsinki, FI
108
Uppsala, SE
86
Olocation not on record
74
Tartu, EE
73
LDlocation not on record
65
DPIlocation not on record
52
WU-MYClocation not on record
39
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
25
MAlocation not on record
19
Kew, GB
18
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
14
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
13
Kuopio, FI
13
Auckland, NZ
11
Stockholm, SE
7
Champaign, US
6
Chapel Hill, US
4
Oulu, FI
4
Porvoo, FI
3
MeiseBGlocation not on record
3
European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record
3
Zürich, CH
2
FLASlocation not on record
2
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
2
Chicago, US
2
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Researchlocation not on record
2
GZUlocation not on record
2
GJOlocation not on record
2
San Sebastián, ES
1
Toronto, CA
1
ILLSlocation not on record
1
Leicester, GB
1
Gijón, ES
1
STUlocation not on record
1
Vancouver, CA
1
Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistanlocation not on record
1
The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, BARO Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Bronx, US
1
TROMlocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
1
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
1
Canberra, AU
1
Copenhagen, DK
1
BDBClocation not on record
1
47 institutions · 1 313 of 1 370 vouchered records shown · 49 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA25 detections
Where the DNA of Erysiphe heraclei was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found25
Studies independent surveys1
Countries4
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 25 detections have coordinates
Open the map4 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median22.0 °C 13.9–23.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter27.8 °C
Max temp (day)27.6 °C 19.3–28.9
Min temp (night)13.9 °C 8.00–15.0
Precipitation5.50 mm/mo 4.50–42.8
Air humidity39.8 % 39.8–59.0
Moisture balance-124 mm/mo -132–-60.4
Vapour deficit1,940 Pa 667–1,962
Wind speed2.40 m/s 2.40–3.10
Cloud cover21.6 % 20.8–32.6
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 9 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility8 237 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI25 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics25 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗