Le myosotis nain est une espèce de plantes vivaces de la famille des Boraginaceae. On l'appelle aussi « éritriche nain », « roi des Alpes », « mousse d'Azur », « myosotis des neiges ». Cette plante est proche des myosotis, mais ce n'est pas un Myosotis véritable de par la forme très différente de leur fruit.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Eritrichium nanum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens6
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections4
Countries5
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Eritrichium nanum voucher personal collection:Dana Suteu:ROD1-EN 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL1★trnL-F★ITS9★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualEritrichium nanum carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — VASUDEVAN, K. N. 1975. Contribution to the cytotaxonomy and cytogeography of the flora of the western Himalayas (with an attempt to compare it with the flora of the Alps). Part II. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 85: 210–252.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy25% within 1 km
≤100 m 932≤1 km 575≤10 km 4 009>10 km 492
6 008 georeferenced · 881 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor6 889
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy55% within 1 km
≤100 m 19≤1 km 94≤10 km 86>10 km 5
204 georeferenced · 262 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence466
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions33 of 49 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Missoula, US
65
Zürich, CH
58
Moscow, US
47
GJOlocation not on record
42
Zürich, CH
41
Salzburg, AT
27
LDlocation not on record
22
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
20
Olocation not on record
19
Bozeman, US
13
Bern, CH
12
Oskarshamn, SE
12
Paris, FR
9
Albuquerque, US
8
Institut und Museum fuer Geologie und Palaeontologielocation not on record
5
Chapel Hill, US
3
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
3
SZUlocation not on record
3
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
3
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
3
Boise, US
3
Sion, CH
3
Denver, US
3
Bourges, FR
2
Wellington, NZ
2
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
2
San Angelo, US
2
Logan, US
2
Provo, US
2
Bloomington, US
2
Porrentruy, CH
1
Davis, US
1
Yellowstone National Park Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Universität Göttingenlocation not on record
1
Chadron, US
1
GZUlocation not on record
1
Xiamen, CN
1
Millersville, US
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
1
Fribourg, CH
1
Saint Louis, US
1
Dresden, DE
1
Walla Walla, US
1
Kew, GB
1
Orem, US
1
Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratorylocation not on record
1
San Jose, US
1
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
1
49 institutions · 457 of 466 vouchered records shown · 7 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Eritrichium nanum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
Alpine tundra
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median-2.50 °C -2.50–9.80
Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.1 °C
Max temp (day)0.9 °C 0.9–15.8
Min temp (night)-7.30 °C -7.30–3.50
Precipitation175 mm/mo 85.4–175
Air humidity60.2 % 50.9–60.2
Moisture balance118 mm/mo -42.7–118
Vapour deficit219 Pa 219–662
Wind speed6.90 m/s 3.20–6.90
Cloud cover46.7 % 28.1–46.7
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.