Eragrostis lehmanniana
Nees · speciesAt a glance
Sources10 archives
Databases and archives Eragrostis lehmanniana's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation1 languages↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 167 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI9 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics11 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotype
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Eragrostis lehmanniana is a species of grass known by the common name Lehmann lovegrass. It is native to southern Africa. It is present elsewhere as an introduced species. It is well known as an invasive weed in some areas, such as Arizona in the United States.Uchytil, Ronald J. (1992). Eragrostis lehmanniana. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. Retrieved 12-22-2011. This grass produces loose, open clumps of stems up to 61 to long,Eragrostis lehmanniana. Grass Manual Treatment. Retrieved 12-22-2011. with some stems growing erect and some lying across the ground and rooting where nodes come in contact with the substrate. The leaves are up to 15 cm long. The inflorescence is a panicle up to 18 cm long by 8 cm wide, with branches appressed to the stems or held out at an angle. The spikelets are up to 1.4 cm long and contain up to 14 flowers each. The grass may spread via stolons. In its native African range this grass is common in several habitat types such as Acacia woodland and Kalahari grasslands and savanna.Skarpe, C. (1986). Plant community structure in relation to grazing and environmental changes along a north-south transect in the western Kalahari. Plant Ecology 68(1) 3-18. Retrieved 12-22-2011. It has been introduced to North and South America. In 1930 the grass was introduced to Arizona in the United States to replace the native grasses that had been severely overgrazed by livestock. In the 1940s the grass was spreading and could be found growing in areas where it had not been planted.Cox, J. R. (1992). Lehmann lovegrass live component biomass and chemical composition. Journal of Range Management 45(6) 523-27. Retrieved 12-22-2011. By 1980 the grass had been sown on over 100,000 acres but it failed to take hold in many regions, such as parts of Texas and New Mexico. In the desert grasslands and shrublands of southeastern Arizona, however, it did well, growing best in areas with sandy soils, rare freezes, and summer rainfall totals of about 15 to. Much beyond these parameters it does not spread or fails to survive. In 1988 it was a major species on 347,000 acres of Arizona desert. In parts of the region, the native ecosystem has been replaced by velvet mesquite woodland with an understory dominated by Lehmann lovegrass.Biedenbender, S. H. and B. A. Roundy. (1996). Establishment of native semidesert grasses into existing stands of Eragrostis lehmanniana in southeastern Arizona. Restoration Ecology 4(2) 155-62. Retrieved 12-22-2011. This species sometimes hybridizes with Eragrostis curvula ("weeping lovegrass").Halvorson, W. L. and P. Guertin. (2003). USGS Weeds in the West project: Status of Introduced Plants in Southern Arizona Parks. page 8. USGS. Retrieved 12-22-2011. The grass produces large monotypic stands that crowd out native grasses and reduce plant and animal diversity.Moran, M. S., et al. Soil evaporative response to Lehmann Lovegrass Eragrostis lehmanniana invasion in a semiarid watershed. The Third Interagency Conference on Research in the Watersheds, 8–11 September 2008, Estes Park, CO. Retrieved 12-22-2011. It forms a soil seed bank that can withstand long dry periods, giving it an advantage over some native grasses.Abbott, L. B. and B. A. Roundy. (2003). Available water influences field germination and recruitment of seeded grasses. Journal of Range Management 56(1) 56-64. Retrieved 12-22-2011. It has been shown to have a negative impact on other types of plants, such as Agave palmeri, a key component in the local ecosystem.Lindsay, D. L. Effects of invasives on the distribution of keystone desert plants on military lands. US Department of Defense Legacy Program. Retrieved 12-22-2011.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology5
Life cycle & reproduction26
Diet & foraging1
Habitat & environment28
Physiology & chemistry21
Uses & economy15
Other traits4
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Eragrostis lehmanniana has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Eragrostis lehmanniana carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
n 201×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl
polyploid inferred1×PloiDB · genus-scale
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
Record type1 167 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions62 of 89 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| ASUlocation not on record | 157 |
| Flagstaff, US | 58 |
| Austin, US | 45 |
| Phoenix, US | 43 |
| Riverside, US | 42 |
| University of Stellenboschlocation not on record | 27 |
| Kew, GB | 27 |
| EL PASO, US | 25 |
| Albuquerque, US | 22 |
| Bronx, US | 19 |
| Fort Worth, US | 13 |
| Claremont, US | 13 |
| Saint Louis, US | 13 |
| Logan, US | 13 |
| San Angelo, US | 12 |
| Hermosillo, MX | 11 |
| Mexico City, MX | 9 |
| San Diego, US | 9 |
| Torreón, MX | 9 |
| Durango, MX | 8 |
| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record | 8 |
| Bloomington, US | 6 |
| Provo, US | 5 |
| Pretoria, ZA | 4 |
| Santa Cruz, US | 4 |
| Ciudad Juárez, MX | 4 |
| Zacatecas, MX | 3 |
| Chapingo, MX | 3 |
| University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record | 3 |
| Guasave, MX | 3 |
| Cenargenlocation not on record | 3 |
| Tampa, US | 3 |
| USFSlocation not on record | 3 |
| South Kensington, GB | 3 |
| Lubbock, US | 3 |
| UFSMlocation not on record | 2 |
| Culiacán, MX | 2 |
| San Isidro, AR | 2 |
| San Luis Obispo, US | 2 |
| Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record | 2 |
| Montecillo, Texcoco, MX | 2 |
| Mount Annan, AU | 2 |
| Wuzhou, CN | 2 |
| Davis, US | 2 |
| Instituto de Investigação Científica Tropicallocation not on record | 2 |
| University of Johannesburg, Department of Botany and Plant Biotechnologylocation not on record | 2 |
| Canberra, AU | 2 |
| MeiseBGlocation not on record | 2 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 1 |
| AUAlocation not on record | 1 |
| Zlocation not on record | 1 |
| Pocatello, US | 1 |
| Long Beach, US | 1 |
| San Diego Natural History Museum, Herbariumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Forest Herbarium Ibadan (FHI)location not on record | 1 |
| Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record | 1 |
| CASlocation not on record | 1 |
| Berlin, DE | 1 |
| Mlocation not on record | 1 |
| Embrapa Agrobiology Diazothrophic Microbial Culture Collectionlocation not on record | 1 |
| Pullman, US | 1 |
| Dekalb, US | 1 |
| Denver, US | 1 |
| Juriquilla, MX | 1 |
| Pittsburg, US | 1 |
| Orem, US | 1 |
| Tempe, US | 1 |
| University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record | 1 |
| Barcelona, ES | 1 |
| Texas A&M Universitylocation not on record | 1 |
| South African National Parks, Scientific Services, Kruger National Parklocation not on record | 1 |
| San Luis Potosí, MX | 1 |
| Durango, US | 1 |
| Knoxville, US | 1 |
| National Museum and Art Gallerylocation not on record | 1 |
| National Botanical Research Institutelocation not on record | 1 |
| Ensenada, MX | 1 |
| Mexico City, MX | 1 |
| The University of Arizonalocation not on record | 1 |
| Mendoza, AR | 1 |
| Santa Barbara, US | 1 |
| La Paz, MX | 1 |
| College Park, US | 1 |
| Boise, US | 1 |
| Angwin, US | 1 |
| Brasília, BR | 1 |
| BAYLUlocation not on record | 1 |
| WAGlocation not on record | 1 |
| Dresden, DE | 1 |
Where the DNA of Eragrostis lehmanniana was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.