A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Eragrostis elliottii has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections1
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK5★rbcL5★ITS
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type936 records
Wild obs. + sensor235
Museum / vouchered701
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 572 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy91% within 1 km
≤100 m 179≤1 km 15≤10 km 5>10 km 14
213 georeferenced · 22 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor235
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy45% within 1 km
≤100 m 49≤1 km 15≤10 km 33>10 km 45
142 georeferenced · 559 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence701
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions34 of 55 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Tampa, US
129
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
85
Bronx, US
73
Miami, US
53
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
48
Saint Louis, US
46
US
36
Durango, MX
24
Austin, US
19
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
13
Valdosta State Universitylocation not on record
12
GAlocation not on record
11
Columbia, US
10
Fort Worth, US
9
Mérida, MX
8
Bangkok, TH
8
Riverside, US
8
Tall Timbers Research Stationlocation not on record
6
Ann Arbor, US
5
Bloomington, US
5
Jackson, US
5
University of Southern Mississippilocation not on record
4
Logan, US
4
ASUlocation not on record
4
EL PASO, US
4
Clemson, US
4
Mérida, MX
3
Chapel Hill, US
3
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
3
BAYLUlocation not on record
3
CASlocation not on record
3
Florida Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
2
Denton, US
2
San Diego, US
2
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
2
Wlocation not on record
2
Montréal, CA
2
Norfolk, US
2
Knoxville, US
2
TLAXlocation not on record
2
University of North Carolina at Pembrokelocation not on record
2
Bureau of Land Management, Medford District Officelocation not on record
1
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Tempe, US
1
Tapachula, MX
1
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
1
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
1
BISHlocation not on record
1
Austin, US
1
Flagstaff, US
1
College Park, US
1
San Angelo, US
1
Due West, US
1
Chicago, US
1
55 institutions · 682 of 701 vouchered records shown · 19 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Eragrostis elliottii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.