Eragrostis brownii adalah sebuah spesies rumput yang dikenal dengan sebutan Browns lovegrass. Ditemukan di Australia dan Selandia Baru, tumbuhan tersebut dapat tumbuh di hutan dan padang rumput. Tumbuh tersebut dapat tumbuh sampai setinggi 6 m (20 ft). Nama belakang spesies tersebut, brownii, diambil dari nama botanis Skotlandia Robert Brown.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
⚠ sources differ — GIFT: herb · AusTraits: graminoid herb
Habitat GIFTdense secondary shrub and ruderal vegetation
Leaf compoundnesssimple
Leaf shapefiliform
Woodinessnon-woody
Physiology & chemistry3
Nitrogen fixingnon_nitrogen_fixer
Photosynthetic pathwayC4
Specific leaf area (SLA)7.87 mm²/mg
Other traits1
Plant support typefree-standing
05DNA & barcoding3 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Eragrostis brownii has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes4
GenBank sequences6
eDNA detections1
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK1★rbcL3★ITS2trnH-psbA
plant barcodefungal barcodemarker
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualEragrostis brownii carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy96% within 1 km
≤100 m 10 267≤1 km 2 029≤10 km 404>10 km 62
12 762 georeferenced · 188 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor12 950
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy41% within 1 km
≤100 m 333≤1 km 310≤10 km 777>10 km 161
1 581 georeferenced · 483 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 064
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km
≤100 m 1
1 georeferenced · 5 without coordinates
Open the mapnot free-living6
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions41 of 58 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Mount Annan, AU
363
Canberra, AU
295
Brisbane, AU
282
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
220
Adelaide, AU
152
NSW Dept of Planning, Industry and Environmentlocation not on record
81
Armidale, AU
75
Auckland, NZ
70
Hobart, AU
43
Nishihara, JP
41
Kensington, AU
34
Palmerston, AU
27
John T. Waterhouse Herbariumlocation not on record
25
Kagoshima, JP
22
Wollongong, AU
22
Wellington, NZ
21
Kew, GB
18
NSW Office of Environment and Heritagelocation not on record
17
Christchurch, NZ
16
TAIElocation not on record
16
James Cook Townsvillelocation not on record
13
Saint Louis, US
12
Nishihara, JP
10
J.F.Oberlin Universitylocation not on record
9
Kochi, JP
9
Smithfield, AU
9
Rotorua, NZ
8
Parkville, AU
8
Tokushima, JP
8
Xiamen, CN
6
Tsukuba, JP
5
Taipei, TW
4
Llocation not on record
4
Pretoria, ZA
4
QVMAGlocation not on record
4
Dresden, DE
3
Department of Land Resources Managementlocation not on record
3
Sendai, JP
3
Chengdu, CN
3
Palmerston North, NZ
2
Wlocation not on record
2
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
2
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
2
Logan, US
2
Stockholm, SE
2
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Mississippi State, US
1
Chicago, US
1
Taipei, TW
1
University of the Sunshine Coastlocation not on record
1
Nagano City, JP
1
Beijing, CN
1
South Kensington, GB
1
Batemans Bay, AU
1
La Trobe Universitylocation not on record
1
BGPAlocation not on record
1
Paris, FR
1
Bronx, US
1
58 institutions · 1 990 of 2 064 vouchered records shown · 74 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Eragrostis brownii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.1 °C 15.1–15.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter10.3 °C
Max temp (day)20.5 °C
Min temp (night)10.7 °C
Precipitation55.8 mm/mo
Air humidity56.0 %
Moisture balance-22.6 mm/mo
Vapour deficit752 Pa
Wind speed1.90 m/s
Cloud cover22.9 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.