A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Entoloma conferendum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens28
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections43
Countries16
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
07Deep time~14.1 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin14.1 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type11 601 records
Wild obs. + sensor10 384
Museum / vouchered1 184
Other33
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO23 332 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy52% within 1 km
≤100 m 3 174≤1 km 1 735≤10 km 4 513>10 km 40
9 462 georeferenced · 922 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor10 384
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy82% within 1 km
≤100 m 136≤1 km 314≤10 km 94>10 km 3
547 georeferenced · 637 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 184
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions30 of 58 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
125
Hobart, AU
57
Copenhagen, DK
53
TROMlocation not on record
34
San Sebastián, ES
26
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
25
WU-MYClocation not on record
23
BDBClocation not on record
19
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
18
MeiseBGlocation not on record
18
Görlitz, DE
17
Oulu, FI
17
Philadelphia, US
17
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
16
Kew, GB
14
Joensuu, FI
13
Trondheim, NO
13
Bardejov, SK
11
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
11
Salzburg, AT
11
LDlocation not on record
10
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
10
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
10
Karlsruhe, DE
9
Helsinki, FI
8
GJOlocation not on record
7
Jyväskylä, FI
7
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
6
nsnflocation not on record
6
Uppsala, SE
5
Osaka, JP
5
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
4
4
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
3
Göteborg, SE
3
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
3
Kuopio, FI
3
Turku, FI
3
Auckland, NZ
3
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
2
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
2
Tartu, EE
2
HabitatVisionlocation not on record
2
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
2
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
2
Zürich, CH
2
Trondheim, NO
1
Kyiv, UA
1
Tilburg, NL
1
TUR-Alocation not on record
1
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
1
Personal Herbarium of John Plischkelocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Vitoria, ES
1
Vancouver, CA
1
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
1
Asheville, US
1
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Nortelocation not on record
1
58 institutions · 673 of 1 184 vouchered records shown · 511 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA43 detections
Where the DNA of Entoloma conferendum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found43
Studies independent surveys3
Countries16
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median9.90 °C 4.80–17.9
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.5 °C
Max temp (day)12.5 °C 7.10–22.6
Min temp (night)6.40 °C 1.10–12.9
Precipitation108 mm/mo 61.4–237
Air humidity64.4 % 58.9–69.0
Moisture balance27.0 mm/mo -9.70–167
Vapour deficit460 Pa 339–863
Wind speed2.70 m/s 1.80–4.50
Cloud cover48.5 % 36.2–63.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 33 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.