A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Entoloma cetratum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens24
Marker genes2
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections113
Countries11
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10★ITS1
fungal barcode
07Deep time~28.5 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin28.5 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type5 882 records
Wild obs. + sensor5 194
Museum / vouchered667
Other21
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO13 964 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy60% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 377≤1 km 1 491≤10 km 1 926>10 km 22
4 816 georeferenced · 378 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor5 194
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy81% within 1 km
≤100 m 136≤1 km 197≤10 km 71>10 km 8
412 georeferenced · 255 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence667
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions27 of 59 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
89
Copenhagen, DK
39
Joensuu, FI
25
TROMlocation not on record
22
Jyväskylä, FI
22
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
21
Oulu, FI
19
Trondheim, NO
16
IB FRC Komi SC UB RASlocation not on record
14
WU-MYClocation not on record
14
Kew, GB
14
Helsinki, FI
13
MeiseBGlocation not on record
13
BDBClocation not on record
12
Göteborg, SE
9
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
9
Görlitz, DE
8
San Sebastián, ES
8
California State University, East Baylocation not on record
7
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
7
Kuopio, FI
6
Karlsruhe, DE
6
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
6
GJOlocation not on record
6
nsnflocation not on record
5
Uppsala, SE
5
Salzburg, AT
5
MAlocation not on record
4
Philadelphia, US
4
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
4
LDlocation not on record
3
Rene Pomerleau Herbariumlocation not on record
3
Ann Arbor, US
3
TENN-Flocation not on record
3
Mlocation not on record
3
Zürich, CH
2
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
2
Vitoria, ES
2
TUR-Alocation not on record
2
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
2
Bardejov, SK
2
BRNUlocation not on record
2
Tartu, EE
2
WTUlocation not on record
2
Entomological Society of Latvialocation not on record
2
Metsähallituslocation not on record
1
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
1
Departamento de Sistematica e Ecologialocation not on record
1
CJBGlocation not on record
1
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
1
Vancouver, CA
1
Tilburg, NL
1
Asheville, US
1
Chicago, US
1
Toronto, CA
1
Denver, US
1
DPIlocation not on record
1
Berlin, DE
1
DIEF VALONSADEROlocation not on record
1
59 institutions · 481 of 667 vouchered records shown · 186 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA113 detections
Where the DNA of Entoloma cetratum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found113
Studies independent surveys4
Countries11
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 113 detections have coordinates
Open the map11 countries0
Forestpå mosemark i bjørkeskog
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median12.0 °C 4.60–17.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.9 °C
Max temp (day)14.0 °C 7.00–21.0
Min temp (night)7.70 °C 0.4–13.6
Precipitation98.3 mm/mo 58.9–168
Air humidity62.4 % 58.8–65.2
Moisture balance7.80 mm/mo -43.6–131
Vapour deficit508 Pa 290–787
Wind speed2.80 m/s 2.10–4.80
Cloud cover48.6 % 37.1–64.7
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 108 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.