Elymus glaucus
Buckley · speciesAt a glance
Sources10 archives
Databases and archives Elymus glaucus's data was compiled from.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility5 148 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI17 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics62 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
GRIN TaxonomyUSDA-ARSdistribution & uses↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
CCDBChromosome Counts DB · Tel Aviv U.genome & karyotype↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
PloiDBPloidy Databasegenome & karyotypeEvery layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Elymus glaucus là một loài thực vật có hoa trong họ Hòa thảo. Loài này được Buckley mô tả khoa học đầu tiên năm 1862 publ. 1863.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Size & morphology4
Life cycle & reproduction26
Diet & foraging1
Habitat & environment24
Physiology & chemistry21
Uses & economy15
Other traits4
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Elymus glaucus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Elymus glaucus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
2n 2810×GoaT · Kew Plant DNA C-values Database · CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 +2
n 142×CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 · CCDB · book-ipcn73-74
tetraploid1×GoaT · Kew Plant DNA C-values Database
polyploid inferred1×PloiDB · family-scale
Record type5 148 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions75 of 122 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Davis, US | 222 |
| WTUlocation not on record | 210 |
| Angwin, US | 196 |
| Claremont, US | 187 |
| Riverside, US | 175 |
| Santa Barbara, US | 151 |
| Arcata, US | 129 |
| ASUlocation not on record | 97 |
| Logan, US | 84 |
| Moscow, US | 83 |
| Missoula, US | 81 |
| San Luis Obispo, US | 75 |
| Bronx, US | 74 |
| DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record | 60 |
| Victoria, CA | 57 |
| Vancouver, CA | 56 |
| Flagstaff, US | 55 |
| San Diego, US | 47 |
| University of Alberta Museumslocation not on record | 41 |
| Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record | 40 |
| University of Stellenboschlocation not on record | 40 |
| Denver, US | 39 |
| US | 39 |
| DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record | 38 |
| Pocatello, US | 32 |
| Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record | 29 |
| Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record | 29 |
| Albuquerque, US | 27 |
| Provo, US | 26 |
| Boise, US | 23 |
| Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratorylocation not on record | 22 |
| Ann Arbor, US | 20 |
| Bozeman, US | 19 |
| Saint Louis, US | 19 |
| Ashland, US | 18 |
| Caldwell, US | 16 |
| Los Angeles, US | 15 |
| Chongqing Museumlocation not on record | 15 |
| Phoenix, US | 15 |
| San Jose, US | 15 |
| CASlocation not on record | 15 |
| Tacoma, US | 10 |
| Kew, GB | 10 |
| Fredericton Stock Culture Collectionlocation not on record | 10 |
| EL PASO, US | 9 |
| Corvallis, US | 8 |
| St. Paul, US | 7 |
| Wuzhou, CN | 7 |
| Bloomington, US | 7 |
| Santa Cruz, US | 7 |
| Portland, US | 7 |
| Cheney, US | 7 |
| GB | 6 |
| Canadian Museum of Nature, National Herbarium of Canadalocation not on record | 6 |
| Pullman, US | 6 |
| Anchorage, US | 6 |
| USFS/BHSClocation not on record | 6 |
| Eastern Nevada Landscape Coalitionlocation not on record | 6 |
| HJAEFlocation not on record | 5 |
| DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record | 5 |
| Pittsburg, US | 5 |
| Irvine, US | 5 |
| Tampa, US | 5 |
| Université Lavallocation not on record | 5 |
| Whitehorse, CA | 4 |
| Spearfish, US | 4 |
| LDlocation not on record | 3 |
| San Angelo, US | 3 |
| Bureau of Land Management, Medford District Officelocation not on record | 3 |
| Research Collection of B. A. Bennettlocation not on record | 2 |
| VALElocation not on record | 2 |
| Yellowstone National Park Herbariumlocation not on record | 2 |
| DOI/NPS, Mount Rainier National Parklocation not on record | 2 |
| STNFlocation not on record | 2 |
| USFSlocation not on record | 2 |
| Weber State Universitylocation not on record | 2 |
| IPA/SPlocation not on record | 2 |
| Millersville, US | 2 |
| KNFHClocation not on record | 2 |
| Nantes Culture Collectionlocation not on record | 2 |
| Orem, US | 2 |
| San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record | 2 |
| US | 2 |
| Bothell, US | 2 |
| Portland, US | 2 |
| Grand Junction, US | 2 |
| Madison, US | 2 |
| Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record | 2 |
| Northridge, US | 1 |
| Tuscaloosa, US | 1 |
| The University of Arizonalocation not on record | 1 |
| Williamsburg, US | 1 |
| Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record | 1 |
| Research Collection of Jonathan Farrlocation not on record | 1 |
| Fayetteville, US | 1 |
| DOI/NPS, Mississippi National River & Recreation Arealocation not on record | 1 |
| Paris, FR | 1 |
| MAlocation not on record | 1 |
| Brock University (BU)location not on record | 1 |
| Wlocation not on record | 1 |
| Brookings, US | 1 |
| Dekalb, US | 1 |
| BClocation not on record | 1 |
| Truckee, US | 1 |
| Jackson, US | 1 |
| Berlin, DE | 1 |
| Beijing, CN | 1 |
| Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record | 1 |
| IDElocation not on record | 1 |
| Yukon Universitylocation not on record | 1 |
| Knoxville, US | 1 |
| Austin, US | 1 |
| Bend, US | 1 |
| Chapel Hill, US | 1 |
| Dresden, DE | 1 |
| Moscow State Universitylocation not on record | 1 |
| San Bernardino, US | 1 |
| KNFSClocation not on record | 1 |
| Lincoln, US | 1 |
| La Paz, MX | 1 |
| Institut de Biologia Evolutiva, (CSIC-UPF)location not on record | 1 |
| Durango, MX | 1 |
Where the DNA of Elymus glaucus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.