Dollfusentis chandleri — The Life Data

Animalia/Acanthocephala/Palaeacanthocephala/Echinorhynchida/Illiosentidae/Dollfusentis

At a glance

Occurrence records104

Data sources7

Biological traits2

DNA specimens10

eDNA detections10

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Dollfusentis chandleri's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility50 records↗

OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System54 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI10 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics10 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources2 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF · OBIS104 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 0 countries10 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD10 specimens

01Narrative

Dollfusentis chandleri is een soort in de taxonomische indeling van de Acanthocephala (haakwormen). De worm wordt meestal 1 tot 2 cm lang. Ze komen algemeen voor in het maag-darmstelsel van ongewervelden, vissen, amfibieën, vogels en zoogdieren. De haakworm komt uit het geslacht Dollfusentis en behoort tot de familie Illiosentidae. Dollfusentis chandleri werd in 1969 beschreven door Golvan.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesSeaLifeBase

Habitat & environment2

Habitat saltwateryes

Habitat zonehost

05DNA & barcoding10 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Dollfusentis chandleri has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens10

Marker genes1

eDNA detections10

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type104 records

Wild obs. + sensor56

Museum / vouchered48

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO208 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1

1 georeferenced · 55 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor56

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 14

14 georeferenced · 34 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence48

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 4 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Harold Winfred Manter Laboratory of Parasitologylocation not on record	30
Mexico City, MX	10
Washington, US	4
Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, Unidad Irapuato, Instituto Politécnico Nacionallocation not on record	1

4 institutions · 45 of 48 vouchered records shown · 3 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA10 detections

Where the DNA of Dollfusentis chandleri was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found10

Studies independent surveys1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 10 detections have coordinates

Open the map0 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.