A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Diploschistes diacapsis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens4
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections4
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Diploschistes diacapsis isolate DD_25_FU small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1 and 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, complete sequence; and internal transcribed spacer 2, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualDiploschistes diacapsis carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈29 147 108 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
THIS GENOME Diploschistes diacapsis0.03 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelContig
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 083 records
Wild obs. + sensor454
Museum / vouchered628
Other1
Origin
Native79
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 452 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy85% within 1 km
≤100 m 18≤1 km 95≤10 km 20
133 georeferenced · 321 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor454
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy29% within 1 km
≤100 m 30≤1 km 42≤10 km 157>10 km 17
246 georeferenced · 382 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence628
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions33 of 64 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
ASUlocation not on record
72
Barcelona, ES
70
BDBClocation not on record
53
Berlin, DE
49
Adelaide, AU
48
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
24
Santa Barbara, US
21
Madison, US
17
LDlocation not on record
15
St. Paul, US
15
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
12
Boise, US
12
Chicago, US
11
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
11
Natural History and Science Museum of the University of PO-Lrto (MHNC-UP)location not on record
11
Madrid, ES
11
Stockholm, SE
10
TSBlocation not on record
10
Canberra, AU
10
Wuzhou, CN
9
Repubblica di San Marinolocation not on record
8
Durham, US
8
Uppsala, SE
7
MeiseBGlocation not on record
6
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
6
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
6
US
6
Hobart, AU
6
MAlocation not on record
5
CJBGlocation not on record
4
València, ES
4
Olocation not on record
4
San Sebastián, ES
3
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
3
Bronx, US
3
Bergen, NO
3
PHlocation not on record
3
Lake Charles, US
2
Philadelphia, US
2
Sion, CH
2
Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institutelocation not on record
2
Wlocation not on record
2
WTUlocation not on record
2
EL PASO, US
2
UAclocation not on record
2
Logan, US
2
UFMSlocation not on record
2
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
2
Mexico City, MX
2
Orem, US
1
Mlocation not on record
1
CLUlocation not on record
1
John T. Waterhouse Herbariumlocation not on record
1
Anchorage, US
1
Toronto, CA
1
Gijón, ES
1
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
1
Weber State Universitylocation not on record
1
San Diego, US
1
University of Hamburglocation not on record
1
Masindi, UG
1
Brisbane, AU
1
University of Gdansklocation not on record
1
ILLSlocation not on record
1
64 institutions · 615 of 628 vouchered records shown · 13 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Diploschistes diacapsis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.