Diplogrammus goramensis

(Bleeker, 1858) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Chordata/Perciformes/Callionymidae/Diplogrammus

At a glance

Occurrence records632

Data sources9

Biological traits6

DNA specimens8

eDNA detections6

Sources9 archives

Databases and archives Diplogrammus goramensis's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility295 records↗

OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System337 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI6 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics8 specimens↗

WikidataWikimedia Foundationstructured facts↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources6 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF · OBIS632 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 4 countries6 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD8 specimens

01Narrative

Diplogrammus goramensis, or Goram dragonet is a species of tropical marine fish in the dragonet family, Callionymidae. It is native to the western Pacific Ocean from China to Fiji.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesFishBase

Size & morphology1

Body length10 cm

Habitat & environment2

Habitat saltwateryes

Habitat zonereef-associated

Other traits3

Depth max40 m

Depth min5 m

Vulnerability10

05DNA & barcoding8 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Diplogrammus goramensis has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens8

BINs4

Marker genes2

eDNA detections6

Countries4

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P618 bp consensus6 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 73% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 164 variable positions, in barcode order

3Cvariable

9Tmostly conserved

10Tvariable

12Amostly conserved

15Cmostly conserved

18Tmostly conserved

19Cvariable

21Avariable

27Gvariable

30Avariable

33Gvariable

38Avariable

42Avariable

45Avariable

48Gvariable

49Gvariable

52Cvariable

54Avariable

69Avariable

75Tmostly conserved

81Cvariable

87Cvariable

90Cvariable

93Avariable

96Cvariable

99Avariable

111Cmostly conserved

123Avariable

126Gvariable

129Avariable

132Tmostly conserved

135Gmostly conserved

138Tvariable

141Avariable

147Cvariable

150Avariable

156Avariable

157Cvariable

159Gmostly conserved

160Avariable

162Cvariable

165Avariable

168Gvariable

171Gmostly conserved

177Avariable

180Cvariable

183Avariable

186Cmostly conserved

189Avariable

192Avariable

204Gmostly conserved

207Cmostly conserved

210Cvariable

213Gmostly conserved

216Tmostly conserved

219Cvariable

222Avariable

225Cvariable

228Avariable

231Cvariable

237Tvariable

240Cvariable

244Avariable

246Avariable

249Cvariable

250Cvariable

252Avariable

258Cvariable

261Avariable

264Cvariable

276Tvariable

279Avariable

285Avariable

288Gmostly conserved

294Avariable

297Gvariable

300Cmostly conserved

306Tvariable

309Tmostly conserved

312Avariable

315Cmostly conserved

318Cmostly conserved

321Tvariable

330Gvariable

333Tvariable

336Cmostly conserved

339Avariable

348Gmostly conserved

351Tmostly conserved

354Cmostly conserved

357Cvariable

369Avariable

372Avariable

375Gvariable

376Avariable

378Cmostly conserved

381Cvariable

384Avariable

387Cvariable

390Tvariable

393Gvariable

396Cvariable

414Avariable

419Cvariable

420Cvariable

423Cvariable

432Cmostly conserved

438Avariable

439Tmostly conserved

444Avariable

447Gmostly conserved

450Tvariable

453Avariable

456Avariable

459Tvariable

460Cvariable

462Gvariable

468Avariable

474Cvariable

477Gvariable

+44 more variable positions not shown

GGCACTGCTTTAAGCCTTCTAATTCGGGCAGAGTTAAACCAACCAGGGGCTCTACTTGGTGATGACCAAATTTATAATGTCATTGTCACC …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)14.4%

Haplotypes3

BINs3

Most divergent pair19.7%

OceaniaOther

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Diplogrammus xenicussame genus12.1%Ompok pabosame order17.4%Sphoeroides annulatussame order17.5%Siganus luridussame order17.8%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P12S

animal barcodemarker

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type632 records

Wild obs. + sensor79

Museum / vouchered551

Other2

Origin

Native1

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO796 km²

Depth

0–200 m sunlit84

200–1000 m twilight0

1–4 km midnight0

>4 km abyssal0

median 2.7 m · max 31 m · 84 records with depth

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy80% within 1 km

≤100 m 13≤1 km 19≤10 km 2>10 km 6

40 georeferenced · 39 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor79

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy46% within 1 km

≤100 m 17≤1 km 35≤10 km 51>10 km 9

112 georeferenced · 439 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence551

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions11 of 25 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Sydney, AU	53
CASlocation not on record	47
Washington, US	46
Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territorylocation not on record	16
Toronto, CA	14
	11
Western Australian Museumlocation not on record	7
Chicago, US	6
South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversitylocation not on record	4
Auckland, NZ	4
Wuzhou, CN	2
Paris, FR	2
Honolulu, US	2
Australian National Fish Collectionlocation not on record	2
Natick, US	2
Unknownlocation not on record	2
Yokosuka City Museumlocation not on record	1
Museums Victorialocation not on record	1
Australian Museum, Sydneylocation not on record	1
University of Kansas, Biodiversity Research Centerlocation not on record	1
University of California San Diegolocation not on record	1
UWFClocation not on record	1
Frankfurt am Main	1
FishBaselocation not on record	1
Fisheries Research Laboratory, Mie Universitylocation not on record	1

25 institutions · 229 of 551 vouchered records shown · 5 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA6 detections

Where the DNA of Diplogrammus goramensis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found6

Studies independent surveys1

Countries4

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 6 detections have coordinates

Open the map4 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median24.4 °C 22.2–26.8

Seasonal swing summer↔winter3.90 °C

Max temp (day)25.0 °C 23.0–27.5

Min temp (night)23.9 °C 21.8–25.9

Precipitation147 mm/mo 45.6–407

Air humidity61.1 % 60.4–66.3

Vapour deficit1,122 Pa 1,052–1,260

Cloud cover28.5 % 18.9–50.1

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 6 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)