Diaporthe phaseolorum

(Cooke & Ellis) Sacc. · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Fungi/Ascomycota/Sordariomycetes/Diaporthales/Diaporthaceae/Diaporthe

At a glance

Occurrence records280

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens114

eDNA detections263

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Diaporthe phaseolorum's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation1 languages↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility277 records↗

OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System3 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI263 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics114 specimens↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF · OBIS280 records

Environmental DNA6 datasets · 20 countries263 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD114 specimens

01Narrative

Diaporthe phaseolorum var. sojae is a plant pathogen infecting soybean and peanut. Diaporthe phaseolorum var. sojae is the perfect form of the causal pathogen of pod and stem blight of soybean.Mueller, Daren and Alison Robertson. "Soybean Diseases." Iowa State University of Science and Technology. (2010): 28. It is a fungal ascomycete that commonly infects seeds, pods, stems, and petioles. This pathogen is also found in its imperfect state, Phomopsis sojae. This is a common disease of most soybean growing regions in the United States. Losses result from losses in field stands, reductions in yield, and poor seed quality.Malvick, Dean K. Pod and Stem Blight, Stem Canker, and Phomopsis Seed Decay of Soybeans. Urbana-Champaign: Department of Crop Sciences University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1997.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding114 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Diaporthe phaseolorum has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens114

Marker genes3

eDNA detections263

Countries20

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★ITS★ITS1★ITS2

fungal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type280 records

Wild obs. + sensor7

Museum / vouchered264

Cultivated / captive8

Other1

Origin

Native1

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO572 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km

≤10 km 5

5 georeferenced · 2 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor7

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy6% within 1 km

≤1 km 5≤10 km 62>10 km 18

85 georeferenced · 179 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence264

Cultivated / Captivenot free-living

A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.

Coordinate accuracy

no georeferenced coordinates · 8 records without

Open the mapnot free-living8

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions8 of 18 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
DPIlocation not on record	88
ILLSlocation not on record	49
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record	18
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record	9
Auckland, NZ	7
Bronx, US	5
Clemson, US	4
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record	3
Lincoln, US	2
FLASlocation not on record	2
Grupo Actinomicetales Merida Facultad de Medicinalocation not on record	2
Brown Universitylocation not on record	1
Pullman, US	1
Chicago, US	1
Karlsruhe, DE	1
PHlocation not on record	1
WU-MYClocation not on record	1
Madison, US	1

18 institutions · 196 of 264 vouchered records shown · 51 without an institution code

Cultivated / Captivenot free-living

A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.

09Environmental DNA263 detections

Where the DNA of Diaporthe phaseolorum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found263

Studies independent surveys6

Countries20

Verifiable raw sequence linked7

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 263 detections have coordinates

Open the map20 countries0

Afrotropic

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median12.5 °C 10.0–23.6

Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.3 °C

Max temp (day)18.4 °C 15.7–28.5

Min temp (night)8.20 °C 5.80–19.3

Precipitation86.2 mm/mo 34.5–222

Air humidity59.8 % 48.3–65.8

Moisture balance-17.5 mm/mo -95.2–96.5

Vapour deficit733 Pa 430–1,186

Wind speed2.90 m/s 1.80–5.80

Cloud cover38.9 % 24.1–44.9

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 61 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)