Dalea purpurea is a species of flowering plant in the legume family known as purple prairie clover.Dalea purpurea at NatureServe.org. Retrieved 11-25-2011. Native to central north America, purple prairie clover is a relatively common member of the Great Plains and prairie ecosystems. It blooms in the summer with dense spikes of bright purple flowers that attract many species of insects.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Dalea purpurea across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Dalea purpurea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens15
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections9
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★rbcL3★rbcLa★ITS5★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualDalea purpurea carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size733 500 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Dalea purpurea0.73 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 142×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-ipcn67-71
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Love, A. & D. Love. 1982. In: A Löve (ed.), IOPB chromosome number reports LXXV. Taxon 31(2): 344–360.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — WEIMARCK, G. 1970. Apomixis and sexuality and Hierochloe alpina (Gramineae) from Finland and Greenland and in ~ monticola from Greenland. Bot. Notiser 123: 495-504.
n 72×CCDB · ipcn-api-dl · CCDB · book-ipcn66
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Ward, D. E. 1983. Chromosome counts from New Mexico and southern Colorado. Phytologia 54: 302–309.
CCDB · book-ipcn66 — Taylor & Brockman 1966
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy88% within 1 km
≤100 m 5 602≤1 km 1 092≤10 km 323>10 km 558
7 575 georeferenced · 1 612 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor9 187
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy53% within 1 km
≤100 m 54≤1 km 128≤10 km 140>10 km 22
344 georeferenced · 447 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence791
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions64 of 95 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
64
Musee des Dinosaures d'Esperaza (Aude)location not on record
55
Spearfish, US
49
Emporia, US
44
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
41
Lincoln, US
41
Denver, US
41
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
39
Bloomington, US
32
Missoula, US
23
Fort Worth, US
21
Jackson, US
18
Pittsburg, US
18
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
17
Albuquerque, US
16
BAYLUlocation not on record
15
Dekalb, US
15
Brookings, US
13
Austin, US
12
Madison, US
12
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
11
Tempe, US
9
Whitewater, US
8
Saint Louis, US
8
Green Bay, US
7
WINlocation not on record
7
US
7
Bozeman, US
6
Flagstaff, US
6
Riverside, US
5
St. Paul, US
5
Bronx, US
5
ASUlocation not on record
4
Columbus State Universitylocation not on record
4
Corvallis, US
4
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
4
Chapel Hill, US
4
Museum of the Rockieslocation not on record
4
Wuzhou, CN
4
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
3
Columbia, US
3
EL PASO, US
3
Beijing, CN
3
Claremont, US
3
Provo, US
3
Whitehorse, CA
3
Logan, US
2
Wlocation not on record
2
Tampa, US
2
Chicago, US
2
CONCOLlocation not on record
2
Tuscaloosa, US
2
Riyadh Municipalitylocation not on record
2
USFSlocation not on record
2
Grand Junction, US
2
GAlocation not on record
2
Mississippi State, US
2
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
2
Boise, US
2
Chicago, US
2
Denton, US
2
Research Collection of B. A. Bennettlocation not on record
2
San Luis Obispo, US
1
University of South Dakotalocation not on record
1
San Diego, US
1
Cheney, US
1
Pocatello, US
1
Northridge, US
1
Millersville, US
1
Pullman, US
1
DOI/NPS, Mississippi National River & Recreation Arealocation not on record
1
Clemson, US
1
Burlington, US
1
Fargo, US
1
Phoenix, US
1
China Agricultural Universitylocation not on record
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Bourges, FR
1
San Angelo, US
1
Texas Lutheran Universitylocation not on record
1
USFS/BHSClocation not on record
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
GBS RAN - Glavny Botanichesky Sad Rossijskoj Akademii Nauklocation not on record
1
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
1
University of South Carolina Salkehatchielocation not on record
1
Angwin, US
1
Kew, GB
1
Paris, FR
1
Bangkok, TH
1
Montréal, CA
1
Chadron, US
1
Lubbock, US
1
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
1
BRNUlocation not on record
1
WTUlocation not on record
1
95 institutions · 784 of 791 vouchered records shown · 6 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA9 detections
Where the DNA of Dalea purpurea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found9
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 9 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median25.5 °C 6.00–26.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter21.7 °C
Max temp (day)31.0 °C 9.70–31.5
Min temp (night)20.6 °C 3.10–21.1
Precipitation105 mm/mo 58.4–118
Air humidity59.0 % 57.9–62.4
Moisture balance-40.5 mm/mo -59.7–5.50
Vapour deficit1,339 Pa 460–1,410
Wind speed2.80 m/s 2.00–4.50
Cloud cover34.3 % 32.7–53.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 7 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.