Dalbergia nigra, commonly known as the Bahia rosewood, jacarandá-da-Bahia, Brazilian rosewood, Rio rosewood, jacarandá-do-brasil, pianowood, caviúna, graúna, jacarandá-una or obuina is a species of legume in the family Fabaceae.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Dalbergia nigra across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Dalbergia nigra has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens2
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences9
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK2★rbcL3★ITS4
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualDalbergia nigra carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 202×CCDB · book-ipcn73-74 · CCDB · iapt
CCDB · book-ipcn73-74 — BANDEL, G. 1974. Chromosome numbers and evolution in the Leguminosae Caryologia 27: 17-32.
CCDB · iapt — IAPT/IOPB Chromosome Data 20
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type525 records
Wild obs. + sensor32
Museum / vouchered493
Origin
Native214
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 080 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km
>10 km 25
25 georeferenced · 7 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor32
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 493 records without
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence493
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions24 of 68 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
JBRJlocation not on record
46
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
36
INMAlocation not on record
28
Santa Teresa, BR
26
Salvador, BR
25
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
23
HUENFlocation not on record
23
UERJlocation not on record
19
CEPLAClocation not on record
18
Ivano-Frankivsk, UA
16
Kew, GB
16
Cenargenlocation not on record
15
UFBAlocation not on record
15
Brasília, BR
14
UFMGlocation not on record
13
Brasília, BR
12
UFVJMlocation not on record
10
UFESlocation not on record
9
USP-IBlocation not on record
9
Federal University of Espírito Santolocation not on record
8
Feira de Santana, BR
8
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santolocation not on record
7
UNICAMPlocation not on record
7
UFRRJlocation not on record
6
Istituto Agrario Castelnuovolocation not on record
6
VALElocation not on record
5
Bogotá, D.C., CO
5
Chaguaramas, TT
4
Seropédica, BR
4
Porto Alegre, BR
4
South Kensington, GB
3
Masindi, UG
3
Ilhéus, BR
3
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)location not on record
3
UFPRlocation not on record
2
Santarém, BR
2
UNESP-FCAlocation not on record
2
Chicago, US
2
URCAlocation not on record
2
Cascavel, BR
2
Blumenau, BR
2
Campo Mourão, BR
1
UNESP-RClocation not on record
1
ESALQlocation not on record
1
UFPIlocation not on record
1
Universidade de São Paulolocation not on record
1
UFPElocation not on record
1
Museum of Zoologylocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeirolocation not on record
1
Cuiabá, BR
1
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
1
PUC-RIOlocation not on record
1
Paris, FR
1
UFRPElocation not on record
1
UESBlocation not on record
1
FUNEDlocation not on record
1
UNESP-ISlocation not on record
1
Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeirolocation not on record
1
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
1
UFSClocation not on record
1
Empresa Pernambucana de Pesquisa Agropecuária, IPAlocation not on record
1
Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreallocation not on record
1
UTFPR-SLlocation not on record
1
Maringá, BR
1
UTFPR-CPlocation not on record
1
Edinburgh, GB
1
Departamento de Sistematica e Ecologialocation not on record
1
68 institutions · 490 of 493 vouchered records shown · 3 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Dalbergia nigra was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.