Compounds documented for Dalbergia hupeana across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Dalbergia hupeana has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens16
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences7
eDNA detections11
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL7★trnL-F★ITS★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 914 records
Wild obs. + sensor47
Museum / vouchered1 865
Cultivated / captive1
Other1
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 900 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy78% within 1 km
≤100 m 16≤1 km 13≤10 km 4>10 km 4
37 georeferenced · 10 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor47
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy18% within 1 km
≤1 km 3≤10 km 5>10 km 9
17 georeferenced · 1 848 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 865
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions39 of 76 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Central China Normal Universitylocation not on record
500
Beijing, CN
225
Chengdu, CN
196
Guangzhou, CN
107
Nanjing, CN
89
Wuhan, CN
88
Yangling, CN
58
Guilin, CN
52
Kunming, CN
51
Institute for Agricultural Bacteriology and Fermentation Biologylocation not on record
44
Edinburgh, GB
36
Zhengzhou, CN
34
Nanjing, CN
29
Changsha, CN
25
Jiangxi Universitylocation not on record
20
Hangzhou, CN
19
Shanghai, CN
16
Nagasaki University - Fisherieslocation not on record
15
Anhui Normal Universitylocation not on record
14
Shanghai, CN
13
WNNUlocation not on record
13
Seoul, KR
12
Guangzhou, CN
12
South Kensington, GB
11
Chengdu, CN
10
Guiyang, CN
10
Taipei, TW
9
Wuhan, CN
9
Chinese Academy of Forestrylocation not on record
8
Awka, NG
8
Xiamen, CN
8
Zhejiang Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
8
Xian, CN
8
Zhejiang Universitylocation not on record
7
Guiyang, CN
7
Chongqing Natural History Museumlocation not on record
6
Zhuzhou, CN
5
Guangxi Agricultural Universitylocation not on record
5
J. Rusek Collectionlocation not on record
4
Xinxiang, CN
4
Beijing Normal Universitylocation not on record
3
Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Scienceslocation not on record
3
Southwest Forestry Collegelocation not on record
3
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
3
Peking Universitylocation not on record
3
GZUlocation not on record
3
Xian, CN
3
Central China Agricultural Universitylocation not on record
3
Chongqing, CN
3
Tianjin Natural History Museumlocation not on record
3
Jishou Universitylocation not on record
2
Lanzhou, CN
2
LDlocation not on record
2
Herbarium of South China Botanical Gardenlocation not on record
2
Bangkok, TH
2
Guiyang, CN
2
Fujian Institute of Subtropical Botanylocation not on record
2
Capital Normal Universitylocation not on record
2
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Academia Sinicalocation not on record
2
贵州梵净山自然保护区标本馆location not on record
2
Philadelphia, US
2
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
1
nlocation not on record
1
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
1
Taipei, TW
1
Minia, EG
1
Yunnan Universitylocation not on record
1
SDFlocation not on record
1
Jiangxi Agricultural Universitylocation not on record
1
Beijing Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
Jiujiang Forestry Institutelocation not on record
1
SMMUlocation not on record
1
Chengdu, CN
1
Jiangxi College of Traditional Chinese Medicinelocation not on record
1
KR
1
Bronx, US
1
76 institutions · 1 862 of 1 865 vouchered records shown · 3 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA11 detections
Where the DNA of Dalbergia hupeana was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found11
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 11 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median25.2 °C 25.2–25.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter24.8 °C
Max temp (day)28.5 °C
Min temp (night)21.2 °C
Precipitation232 mm/mo
Air humidity64.0 %
Moisture balance114 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,153 Pa
Wind speed1.70 m/s
Cloud cover41.8 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.