Daedalea quercina is a species of mushroom in the order Polyporales, and the type species of the genus Daedalea. Commonly known as the oak mazegill or maze-gill fungus, the specific epithet refers to the oak genus Quercus, upon which it frequently grows, causing a brown rot. It is found in Europe, Asia, Northern Africa and Australasia. Though inedible, it can be used as a natural comb and has been the subject of chemical research.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Daedalea quercina across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile4 classes
Lanostane, Tirucallane and Euphane triterpenoids17
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Daedalea quercina has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens13
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections17
Countries6
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS10
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceNCBI
The complete instruction manualDaedalea quercina carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size32 740 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
THIS GENOME Daedalea quercina0.03 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy18% within 1 km
≤100 m 2 328≤1 km 915≤10 km 14 164>10 km 127
17 534 georeferenced · 3 437 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor20 971
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy34% within 1 km
≤100 m 63≤1 km 223≤10 km 474>10 km 84
844 georeferenced · 374 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 218
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km
≤10 km 1
1 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates
Open the mapnot free-living2
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions46 of 87 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
291
Olocation not on record
148
Uppsala, SE
82
GJOlocation not on record
60
Görlitz, DE
32
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
30
Karlsruhe, DE
28
Kew, GB
25
LDlocation not on record
24
TENN-Flocation not on record
24
Copenhagen, DK
23
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
18
PHlocation not on record
17
Pullman, US
17
Toronto, CA
16
San Sebastián, ES
16
Tartu, EE
16
Champaign, US
15
ILLSlocation not on record
14
Zapopan, MX
11
WU-MYClocation not on record
10
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
10
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
10
Philadelphia, US
8
Warsaw, PL
7
Burlington, US
7
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
7
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
7
Lincoln, US
7
Vitoria, ES
7
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
6
Mlocation not on record
6
Ann Arbor, US
6
Chapel Hill, US
6
Oskarshamn, SE
5
WTUlocation not on record
5
Universidad de los Llanos (UniLlanos)location not on record
5
Jyväskylä, FI
5
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
5
Winterthur, CH
5
Trondheim, NO
5
Mexico City, MX
5
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
4
St. Paul, US
4
Cincinnati, US
4
Durham, US
4
TROMlocation not on record
4
Madison, US
4
Salamanca, ES
4
JA-CAGPDS-CAMlocation not on record
4
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
4
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
4
Stockholm, SE
3
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
3
Grupo Actinomicetales Merida Facultad de Medicinalocation not on record
3
Blacksburg, US
3
Kathmandu, NP
3
BRNUlocation not on record
2
UJEDlocation not on record
2
Staten Island, US
2
Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Victorialocation not on record
2
FLASlocation not on record
2
Brown Universitylocation not on record
2
Göteborg, SE
2
Baton Rouge, US
2
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
2
BioFokuslocation not on record
2
BDBClocation not on record
2
Kensington, AU
1
Bourges, FR
1
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
1
Clemson, US
1
Durango, MX
1
Gijón, ES
1
Coimbra, PT
1
Tampa, US
1
DPIlocation not on record
1
Universidade Federale do Rio Grande do Sullocation not on record
1
CA
1
MFUlocation not on record
1
GZUlocation not on record
1
Auckland, NZ
1
Bardejov, SK
1
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
1
Laramie, US
1
Mérida, ES
1
MAlocation not on record
1
87 institutions · 1 147 of 1 218 vouchered records shown · 70 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA17 detections
Where the DNA of Daedalea quercina was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found17
Studies independent surveys3
Countries6
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 17 detections have coordinates
Open the map6 countries0
Rich deciduous forest on marine deposits, do…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median12.4 °C 6.40–17.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.1 °C
Max temp (day)15.2 °C 10.0–20.3
Min temp (night)9.20 °C 3.30–15.7
Precipitation70.8 mm/mo 42.6–126
Air humidity62.8 % 55.5–65.8
Moisture balance27.2 mm/mo -88.8–52.5
Vapour deficit541 Pa 363–876
Wind speed3.30 m/s 2.40–4.80
Cloud cover43.3 % 24.7–47.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 7 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.